The match against Cape Verde was significant not only for the victory but also for Lionel Messi's return to the starting lineup after being rested in the previous game. The Argentina captain scored a goal in the 3-2 thriller, reminding the world of his enduring quality on the biggest stage. For Roccuzzo, the evening was a blend of personal pride and public celebration. Her Instagram tribute quickly resonated with thousands of followers, who see her as an integral part of Messi's support system during the high-pressure tournament.

A Superstition Takes Shape

Beyond the emotional post, eagle-eyed fans have noticed a developing pattern in Roccuzzo's matchday attire. For Argentina's first and third group-stage matches, she wore the home shirt (the iconic white and light blue stripes). For the second and fourth matches, she switched to the away jersey (predominantly dark blue with subtle accents). The alternating choice has spawned speculation that Roccuzzo may have adopted a new World Cup superstition — one that previously brought Argentina luck during their victorious 2022 campaign in Qatar.

During the 2022 World Cup, Roccuzzo initially wore the home shirt, but after Argentina suffered a shocking 2-1 loss to Saudi Arabia in their opening match, she switched to the away kit and never looked back. Argentina proceeded to win their next six matches, culminating in a dramatic penalty shootout victory over France in the final. Several members of the Messi family, including his parents Jorge and Celia, also followed the same jersey pattern during that miraculous run. Now, as Argentina again pushes for glory, fans are scrutinizing every detail — including what Roccuzzo wears in the stands.

The superstition theory has gained traction on social media platforms, with supporters debating whether the away shirt holds a special charm. Some argue that the alternate kit brings better luck, while others believe it is merely a personal preference. Regardless of the reason, the attention on Roccuzzo's jersey choices reflects the immense passion that surrounds the Argentine national team during World Cup tournaments.

The Match in Context: Argentina vs. Cape Verde

Argentina's 3-2 victory over Cape Verde was not without its tense moments. Cape Verde, a smaller footballing nation, put up a spirited fight, exposing occasional vulnerabilities in Argentina's defense. The match saw goals from Messi, Ángel Di María, and Julián Álvarez for Argentina, while Cape Verde's goals came from Ryan Mendes and Jamiro Monteiro. Despite the close scoreline, Argentina showed resilience and attacking flair, qualities that will be essential if they are to repeat their 2022 triumph.

Messi's goal was a trademark finish — a composed strike after a clever run into the box. It marked another milestone in his storied career, adding to his already staggering World Cup goal tally. For the 37-year-old, each game in this tournament could be his last on football's biggest stage, making every moment precious. His family's presence in the stands provides a constant source of motivation. Antonela and the boys have been fixtures at almost every major tournament Messi has played in since his debut, and their support is widely acknowledged by the player himself as a key factor in his longevity.

Antonela Roccuzzo: More Than a WAG

Antonela Roccuzzo is not just the wife of a football star; she is a public figure in her own right. Born in Rosario, Argentina, she met Messi when they were children, and they have been together ever since. Over the years, she has built a successful career as a model, influencer, and entrepreneur. Her social media presence, especially on Instagram, attracts millions of followers who admire her style, family values, and unwavering support for her husband.

During World Cups, Roccuzzo's role becomes even more prominent. She often shares behind-the-scenes glimpses of team celebrations, family moments, and even outfit details. Her posts go viral quickly, creating a connection between the players' families and the global fanbase. The “Vamos Argentina” message after the Cape Verde win is a perfect example of how she amplifies the national pride that surrounds the team.

Interestingly, an aesthetics expert recently commented on Roccuzzo's youthful appearance, noting that her skincare regimen and lifestyle contribute to her ageless look. This type of coverage, while seemingly trivial, underscores the media's fascination with the Messi-Roccuzzo family. Every detail — from her choice of jersey to her facial expressions — is analyzed by fans and journalists alike.

The 2026 World Cup Push

Argentina entered the 2026 World Cup as defending champions, carrying the weight of expectations. The team has a mix of experienced veterans like Messi and Di María, and younger talents such as Álvarez and Enzo Fernández. Under manager Lionel Scaloni, they have maintained a cohesive unit that plays attacking, possession-based football. The group stage has been relatively smooth so far, with the win over Cape Verde keeping them on track for a favorable knockout round draw.

Messi's fitness and form remain crucial. After missing one game due to minor muscle fatigue, his return against Cape Verde was met with relief and excitement. He played the full 90 minutes, showcasing his usual dribbling, passing, and goal-scoring ability. Scaloni will likely manage his minutes carefully in the subsequent matches, but Messi's hunger for another title is palpable.

The role of the families in the success of the national team cannot be overstated. Antonela's presence, along with the children, creates a sense of normalcy amid the chaos of international tournaments. They travel with the squad, attend matches, and celebrate victories together. This family-first approach has been a hallmark of the Messi household, and it endears them to fans around the world.

A Brief History of Argentina at the World Cup

Argentina's footballing history is rich with World Cup triumphs and heartbreaks. They won the tournament in 1978, 1986, and most recently in 2022. The 2022 victory was especially emotional because it came after a 36-year drought and provided Messi with the one major trophy that had eluded him. The run to glory included memorable matches against the Netherlands, Croatia, and France.

In the 2022 final against France, Argentina led 2-0 before a stunning fightback by Kylian Mbappé forced extra time. Messi scored twice in the match, including one in extra time, and converted his penalty in the shootout. The victory cemented his legacy as one of the greatest players of all time. Now, as he chases a second consecutive World Cup, the entire nation is behind him.

This year's tournament has already produced its share of surprises, with underdog teams like Cape Verde pushing established powerhouses to the brink. Argentina's ability to grind out results, even when not at their best, is a sign of a champion mentality. The defense has shown some cracks, but the attack — led by Messi — remains lethal.

As Argentina moves forward in the tournament, every small detail will be magnified. Antonela Roccuzzo's alternating jersey choice is just one of many subplots that capture the imagination of fans. If the superstition holds true, she might stick with the away shirt for the remainder of the competition — much like she did in 2022. Whether it's luck, routine, or fashion, it has become part of the Argentine World Cup folklore.

Meanwhile, Messi continues to defy age. His performances have drawn praise from former players, pundits, and rivals alike. He remains the heart of the team, and his family remains his anchor. Antonela's simple Instagram tribute may seem like a small gesture, but for millions of fans, it symbolizes the unity and love that drives this extraordinary football journey.

The next match for Argentina will be against a yet-to-be-determined opponent in the knockout rounds. All eyes will be on Messi, on the team, and — in a curious way — on what Antonela Roccuzzo chooses to wear in the stands. It is a testament to the passion of the sport that such details can become part of the narrative, weaving together football, family, and superstition into a story that captivates a global audience.

Source: MSN News

Multiple media reports say South Korea's spy agency believes North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is preparing his teenage daughter to succeed him. The leader's daughter, believed to be around 13 and named Kim Ju Ae, has been named as a possible successor, building on the agency's previous assessments. Recent photos showing Kim Ju Ae riding a tank are cited in the intelligence report, casting the public display as an attempt to dispel doubts about her rank in the family.

Who is Kim Ju Ae?

Limited information is available about the inner workings of the Kim family, though the current leader has been slightly more public than his father and grandfather were. It's unclear how many children Kim Jong Un has. The publication of his daughter's name came from an unlikely, and possibly accidental, source: former NBA player Dennis Rodman. The basketball star, who struck up a bizarre friendship with the leader after visiting the country in 2013, shared her name in an interview with The Guardian, saying he "held their baby Ju-ae and spoke with Ms. Ri [Sol-Ju, Kim's wife] as well."

Kim Jong Un is married to Ri Sol Ju, and they are believed to have at least three children: Kim Ju Ae, a son born around 2010, and another child. However, only Kim Ju Ae has been publicly seen with her father in recent years.

Public appearances and grooming

Since 2022, Kim Ju Ae has appeared alongside her father at a series of high-profile events. In November 2022, she was photographed at the launch of an intercontinental ballistic missile. Since early 2026, the frequency of her appearances has increased dramatically. In February and March 2026, state media captured her at military parades, munitions factories, tree-planting ceremonies, and even driving a tank. She has also been shown firing a pistol and a sniper rifle at shooting ranges.

These appearances bear a striking resemblance to how Kim Jong Un himself was introduced to the public by his father, Kim Jong-il. In the early 2010s, Kim Jong Un was shown inspecting military units and attending state events, gradually building a public image before taking full power in December 2011. South Korea's National Intelligence Service (NIS) interprets the recent photos of Kim Ju Ae as a deliberate strategy to solidify her position as heir apparent.

Historical context of North Korean succession

North Korea is a hereditary dictatorship, one of the few countries in the world where leadership passes directly from father to son. Kim Il-sung founded the nation in 1948 and ruled until his death in 1994, when his son Kim Jong-il took over. After Kim Jong-il's death in 2011, his youngest son, Kim Jong Un, assumed power. The dynasty relies on a cult of personality, with the Kim family portrayed as almost divine figures.

The grooming of a female successor, however, would be unprecedented. No woman has ever led North Korea, and the country remains deeply patriarchal. Yet Kim Ju Ae's appearances—especially her involvement in military and weapons events—suggest that gender barriers may be set aside to preserve the Kim dynasty. Analysts note that Kim Jong Un may be seeking to secure his legacy and prevent any power struggles after his death or incapacitation.

Intelligence assessments and expert skepticism

On March 31, 2026, South Korean lawmakers were briefed by the NIS, which stated that it believes Kim Ju Ae is being positioned as Kim Jong Un's successor. The assessment cited the tank-driving images as well as the fact that she has been given the title "hyangdo" (meaning guide) in state media—a term previously used only for Kim Jong Un himself. Kim Ju Ae also received the highest honor in the state, the Order of Kim Il-sung, in February 2026.

However, some experts urge caution. Hong Min, an analyst at the Korea Institute for National Unification, told Reuters that Kim Ju Ae's tank appearance alone was insufficient to conclude she had been confirmed as heir. He noted that she appeared alongside her father rather than independently, unlike Kim Jong Un's solo military appearances during his grooming phase. Others point out that Kim Jong Un is still relatively young (born in 1984) and could rule for decades, making a succession plan less urgent.

Nevertheless, the NIS briefing indicates that Kim Ju Ae is receiving special treatment. She has been seen at a military command center, inspecting troops, and even wearing a military-style uniform. The spy agency believes that her appearances are intended to build loyalty among the elite and the military, who are the ultimate power brokers in North Korea.

Implications for North Korea's future

If Kim Ju Ae does become the next leader, it would mark a dramatic shift for a nation that has never had a female ruler. It could influence domestic perceptions of gender roles and potentially alter the dynastic tradition. However, the transition is far from certain. Kim Jong Un has two older siblings—Kim Jong-chol and Kim Yo-jung, his sister, who is also a high-ranking official. Kim Yo-jung has been seen as a possible successor, but she has recently taken a less prominent role.

The international community watches these developments closely. A succession plan involving a teenage girl raises questions about stability and control. North Korea's nuclear weapons program and its tense relations with the United States and South Korea mean that any leadership change will have global repercussions.

Recent events and public spectacle

In March 2026, Kim Jong Un and his daughter were shown boarding a new tank at Training Base No. 60 in Pyongyang. State media described the event as a demonstration of the people's army's combat capability. Earlier in February, Kim Ju Ae attended the inauguration of a new street in Pyongyang and participated in the 9th Congress of the Workers' Party of Korea's military parade. She has also been pictured inspecting pets shops, musical instrument stores, and automobile service centers—perhaps indicating a desire to present her as a modern, relatable figure.

The images have been widely disseminated in state-controlled media, and they are often accompanied by adulatory commentary. One photo showed Kim Ju Ae planting trees with her father, while another captured her watching a performance for International Women's Day. These staged events reinforce the idea of a benevolent and active ruling family.

In addition to domestic propaganda, the regime may be sending a message to the international community. By showcasing his daughter, Kim Jong Un is signaling continuity and dynastic strength. It could also be a move to deter any internal challenges by making the succession plan public.

Conclusion

The emergence of Kim Ju Ae as a potential heir represents a significant development in North Korea's dynastic trajectory. While the timing remains uncertain, the grooming process is already underway. Whether she will indeed become the first female leader of North Korea—or whether she will fade from view as quickly as she appeared—remains to be seen. For now, the world watches as a teenage girl is prepared for one of the most isolated and unpredictable roles in global politics.

Source: Yahoo News News

Lewandowski, who turns 38 on Aug. 21, leaves FC Barcelona after four seasons in which he scored 119 goals in 192 appearances and helped the Catalan giants capture three La Liga championships, including the 2025-26 season just completed. His arrival in Chicago marks a significant coup for both the Fire and MLS, which continues to attract global icons in the twilight of their careers.

The move comes after weeks of speculation linking Lewandowski with a transfer to North America. The Fire, currently third in the Eastern Conference with 26 points from 14 games at the league's break for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, see Lewandowski as the centerpiece of an ambitious rebranding effort. The franchise recently opened a state-of-the-art training facility and has begun construction on McDonald's Park, a soccer-specific stadium scheduled to open in 2028.

Contract Details and Designated Player Status

According to the club, Lewandowski will occupy one of three designated player slots, allowing the Fire to pay him a salary above the league's strict salary cap. His contract runs through the end of the 2027-2028 season, covering the remainder of the 2026 campaign, the 2027 mini-season (the transition year when MLS shifts to a fall-to-spring calendar to align with European leagues), and the first half of the 2027-28 season. The total value of the deal was not disclosed, but sources suggest it is one of the richest in MLS history.

Lewandowski's potential debut could come on July 16 against the Vancouver Whitecaps at Soldier Field. The Fire will then host a summer schedule that includes matches against LA Galaxy, New York Red Bulls, and Atlanta United, giving fans a chance to see the legendary scorer in action.

A Legendary Career in Europe

Before joining Barcelona in 2022 for a $52 million transfer fee, Lewandowski spent eight seasons at Bayern Munich, where he became one of the most prolific goal-scorers in Bundesliga history. He netted 312 goals in 384 Bundesliga appearances for both Bayern and his first German club, Borussia Dortmund, winning 10 league titles across the two clubs. His individual honors include two FIFA Best Men's Player awards (2020, 2021) and a Ballon d'Or in 2020 that was officially awarded by France Football (the 2020 ceremony was canceled due to the pandemic, but he was widely considered the rightful winner).

At Dortmund, he burst onto the scene, scoring 103 goals in 187 games and winning two Bundesliga titles. His most famous performance came in the 2013 UEFA Champions League semifinal against Real Madrid, where he scored four goals in a 4-1 victory. He later moved to Bayern on a free transfer in 2014, where he won eight Bundesliga titles, three DFB-Pokal cups, and the 2020 UEFA Champions League, completing a treble under Hansi Flick. In that 2019-20 season, Lewandowski scored 55 goals in all competitions, including 15 in the Champions League, cementing his status as the world's best striker.

At Barcelona, he adapted quickly to La Liga, winning the Pichichi Trophy (top scorer) in his first season with 23 goals. He helped the club rebuild and regain domestic dominance after years of financial turmoil. His final match for Barcelona on May 17, 2026, was an emotional affair at Camp Nou: after a 3-1 victory over Real Betis, his teammates threw him into the air, and the fans gave him a standing ovation as he walked off the pitch. The gesture underscored the deep respect he earned during his time in Spain.

International Career with Poland

Lewandowski's influence extends to the international stage, where he is Poland's all-time leading scorer with 89 goals in 167 appearances. He made his debut in 2008 against San Marino and scored his first goal in that match. He has captained the national team since 2014 and led them to two World Cups: 2018 and 2022, with a best finish of the round of 16 in Qatar. He also holds the record for most goals in European Championship qualifiers.

However, Poland failed to qualify for the 2026 World Cup, missing the tournament for the first time since 2014. After the qualification failure, Lewandowski hinted that he might retire from international duty. Poland's next matches are in the UEFA Nations League in September, but it remains unclear if he will feature.

Chicago Fire's Ambition and Stadium Plans

The signing of Lewandowski is part of a larger transformation for the Chicago Fire, a club that has struggled to match the success of other MLS powerhouses since its inception in 1997. The franchise won the MLS Cup in its inaugural season and the U.S. Open Cup in 1998, 2000, and 2003, but has not reached the MLS Cup final since 2000. In recent years, the team has invested heavily in infrastructure, including a new training center opened in 2025 and the planned McDonald's Park, a 25,000-seat stadium that will provide a dedicated soccer venue, replacing Soldier Field as the primary home.

Coach Gregg Berhalter, a former U.S. national team manager who took over the Fire in 2024, expressed excitement about the signing. “We set out to build a world-class club that inspires greatness, unites Chicago and wins championships. Robert embodies those values and represents the standards this city deserves: a champion and a competitor,” Berhalter said in a statement. “His arrival reinforces our ambition to compete for trophies and raises the standards for the club to heights worthy of this city. We cannot wait to get to work with him and have Chicago see first-hand why he is among the most revered sporting icons in the world.”

Impact on MLS and American Soccer

Lewandowski joins a growing list of European superstars who have brought their talents to MLS in recent years, including Lionel Messi (Inter Miami), Zlatan Ibrahimovic (LA Galaxy), and Gareth Bale (LAFC). His presence is expected to boost attendance and television ratings for the Fire, who have averaged around 20,000 fans per game this season. The club hopes his signing will also help attract younger talent and elevate the profile of soccer in the Chicago area.

Critics have questioned whether a 38-year-old striker can adapt to the physical demands of MLS, which often features a faster pace and more travel than European leagues. However, Lewandowski's exceptional fitness regimen and technical ability suggest he can still be effective. In his final season at Barcelona, he scored 22 goals in all competitions, showing he remains a clinical finisher.

The arrival of Lewandowski also has ramifications for the league's competitive balance. With the Fire now armed with a player of his caliber, they become serious contenders in the Eastern Conference. The team currently sits third but has played fewer games than some rivals. If Lewandowski can replicate even half of his European output, Chicago could make a deep playoff run in 2026.

As Lewandowski prepares to cross the Atlantic, he leaves behind a legacy in Europe that will be remembered for generations. But his journey is not over. In Chicago, he has the opportunity to write a new chapter, win a different kind of trophy, and inspire a new generation of soccer fans in the United States. The first test comes in July against Vancouver, and the soccer world will be watching.

Source: Newsday News

The reasons behind the omission are layered. According to reports, Suarez initially told Bielsa that he would prefer to step aside and allow younger players to take his place, as Uruguay continues a generational shift from the golden era of the 2010s to a new core headlined by Darwin Núñez, Federico Valverde, and Ronald Araújo. However, after further reflection, Suarez reversed his stance and informed the Argentine coach that he would be happy to play a role in the squad, even if it meant coming off the bench. Bielsa, known for his rigid principles and long-term planning, stuck with his earlier decision, selecting Núñez, Rodrigo Aguirre, and Federico Viñas as the team's center forward options.

This marks the end of Suarez's remarkable World Cup journey, which began in 2010 in South Africa. Over four tournaments, he played 16 matches and scored seven goals, including three in 2010, two in 2014, and two in 2018. He was held scoreless in Qatar 2022 as Uruguay made a disappointing group-stage exit. Suarez's World Cup legacy is defined by both brilliance and controversy. In 2010, he deliberately handled the ball on the goal line in the quarterfinal against Ghana, conceding a penalty but saving Uruguay from elimination. Asamoah Gyan missed the spot kick, and Uruguay advanced on penalties. In 2014, Suarez infamously bit Italian defender Giorgio Chiellini, earning a nine-match international ban and a four-month suspension from all soccer activities. Despite those incidents, Suarez remains a hero in Uruguay, beloved for his passion, resilience, and match-winning ability.

Bielsa's decision underscores his commitment to building a younger, more energetic squad that can compete deep into the tournament. Uruguay are in Group H alongside Spain, Saudi Arabia, and Cape Verde. With Spain as a clear favorite and the other two teams considered underdogs, La Celeste have a realistic path to the knockout rounds. Bielsa believes that Núñez, who has been in prolific form for Liverpool and the national team, can lead the line effectively alongside Aguirre and Viñas. The coach has also called up attacking midfielders like Giorgian de Arrascaeta and Facundo Pellistri to provide creativity from deeper positions.

Suarez's place in Uruguayan football history

Luis Suarez retires from World Cup football with 69 goals in 138 appearances for Uruguay, making him the nation's all-time top scorer. He debuted in 2007 and quickly became part of a golden generation that also featured Diego Forlán and Edinson Cavani. Together, they led Uruguay to a fourth-place finish at the 2010 World Cup, a Copa América title in 2011, and a strong showing at the 2018 World Cup where they reached the quarterfinals. Suarez's club career is equally stellar. He won the Eredivisie with Ajax, the Premier League with Liverpool, multiple La Liga titles with Barcelona (including a treble in 2014–15), and the La Liga title with Atlético Madrid in 2020–21. He later played for Grêmio in Brazil and joined Inter Miami in 2024, where he continues to score goals alongside Lionel Messi.

Suarez's absence means Uruguay lose a player who could change a game with a single moment of improvisation, a sharp turn, or a clinical finish. His work rate off the ball and his ability to press defenders have often been overlooked, but Bielsa values physical output and tactical discipline. Interestingly, Suarez's current teammate at Inter Miami, Lionel Messi, will also be at the 2026 World Cup as Argentina's captain, adding another layer of irony: the two former Barcelona stars shared a club dressing room but will now experience the tournament on opposite sides.

The decision to leave Suarez at home has drawn criticism from some former Uruguay players and fans who believe his experience could be invaluable in a high-pressure environment. However, Bielsa has a reputation for making tough decisions based on what he perceives as the long-term health of the team. He previously omitted veteran players like Edinson Cavani from early rosters during his tenure, though Cavani eventually made the squad. Suarez, at 39 years old by the time of the 2026 tournament, would be one of the oldest outfield players in the competition. While his fitness remains solid, Bielsa likely sees the World Cup as an opportunity to prepare the next generation for the 2030 cycle, when Uruguay will co-host the tournament alongside Argentina and Paraguay.

In a twist of fate, Suarez will be physically close to his national team during the group stage. Two of Uruguay's group matches are scheduled at Miami Stadium in Miami Gardens, Florida—just a short drive from Suarez's home in South Florida. He will watch from the stands, a spectator for the first time at a World Cup since his debut. For a player who has shaped World Cup narratives with his hands, teeth, and feet, this is a bittersweet farewell.

Uruguay's other forwards will now carry the burden. Darwin Núñez has 16 goals in 38 appearances for his country and has shown flashes of brilliance for Liverpool, though consistency remains a work in progress. Rodrigo Aguirre, who scored crucial goals for Liga MX side Monterrey and has been in good form, offers a physical presence. Federico Viñas, also based in Mexico, provides a different profile as a mobile target man. None of them have Suarez's pedigree, but they represent the new wave of Uruguayan attackers.

Bielsa's squad also includes midfield stalwarts like Federico Valverde, Rodrigo Bentancur, and Manuel Ugarte, as well as a solid defensive line featuring Ronald Araújo, José María Giménez, and Mathías Olivera. The team will rely on rapid transitions and high pressing—hallmarks of Bielsa's system. Without Suarez, Uruguay lose a link player who can drop deep to receive and then turn to create chances. However, Bielsa seems confident that the collective system can compensate for the absence of the individual star.

For Suarez, the 2026 World Cup will always be a what-if. He had hoped to follow in the footsteps of players like Antonio Valencia, who appeared in five World Cups, or even his former national teammate Diego Forlán, who retired after 2014. Instead, Suarez's World Cup career ends with 7 goals and a complex legacy that includes moments of genius and moments of infamy. He will be remembered as one of the most feared strikers of his generation, and his absence from the tournament is a reminder that even legends cannot defy the passage of time.

Uruguay will kick off their campaign against Spain on June 14, followed by matches against Saudi Arabia and Cape Verde. Bielsa's decision will be scrutinized with every missed chance or defensive lapse. If Uruguay progress deep into the tournament, the omission will be seen as a masterstroke. If they struggle to score, the questions about Suarez's absence will grow louder. Regardless, Suarez's influence on this Uruguay team remains undeniable, even from afar.

In the end, Suarez's World Cup story is one of a player who gave everything for his country, often at the edge of reason. He took a red card in 2010 that some considered heroism and others cheating. He bit an opponent in 2014, an act that cost him dearly. He scored screamers and tap-ins, celebrated with tears and roars. He leaves the World Cup stage without a final bow, but his imprint on the tournament is permanent.

Source: MSN News

Halfpoint - Fotolia

When Neiberding arrived, he quickly realised that the technology design for the new campus was not going to achieve one of the institute's key strategic priorities – namely, campus utilisation. The original model had been co-designed with teachers, meaning every room was different. Having so many variations limited utilisation while teachers couldn't readily use one room one day and another the next because they weren't familiar with the layout or audio-visual (AV) equipment.

There wasn't a digital transformation strategy, Neiberding observed. While the institute had a strategic direction, he felt there was a significant missed opportunity that wasn't going to achieve the actual outcomes the institute was looking for. So, he surveyed CIT's software and looked for opportunities.

CIT had historically taken a largely departmental approach to choosing hardware and software, resulting in a mix of Microsoft Teams and Zoom, along with different brands of video projectors. You name it, we used it, Neiberding said, despite the ACT government already having a significant technology investment with Cisco.

Although the Woden building was already under construction, there was still an opportunity to adopt a standardised design. The goal was to maximise utilisation while keeping students at the centre of CIT's operations, removing barriers to maximise learning opportunities. This last point was especially important to Neiberding, who serves as the executive sponsor for inclusion at CIT and has three children with neurodivergent needs.

Inclusive, hybrid-first learning

Neiberding had a lightbulb moment when he visited a room on the Bruce campus used for physiotherapy practicals and noticed a webcam connected to the teacher's laptop. He learned it was set up to support a student who struggled to attend in person but still wanted to participate.

Realising there was an opportunity to standardise efforts to support inclusivity, he noted: What we have done at Woden is try to remove the barriers that exist for all learners, whatever their needs are, as we move through this next skills uplift.

The resulting environment integrates with various systems to account for which class is scheduled for a particular room and time, which students will be attending, and to help teachers create content for hybrid delivery. Each classroom now features a standardised layout of screens: a fixed panel, an interactive panel, and a rear screen displaying students attending online, allowing the teacher to see them and integrate them into the classroom conversation.

We haven't just put communication and collaboration devices on the wall and walked away; we've actually taught the workforce how to use them and how to make them engaging, he said. We've removed the walls from the classroom. You can get a learning experience remotely that is similar to being in the classroom. Those physically present also benefit. For example, students can turn on live captions, allowing them to read rather than listen to the teacher if that better suits their learning needs.

The standardised approach also addressed the problem of varying room layouts. Previously, teachers had their own dedicated classrooms, which hindered utilisation, as classes were not always matched with appropriately sized rooms. Under the new model, no one owns a particular room unless it is a specialised practical space, such as those used for hairdressing, hospitality, graphic design or cyber security. Instead, teachers are allocated the right room based on class requirements, with each offering a standardised environment.

Zero on-site support and improved security

The classroom equipment was designed to largely eliminate the need for on-premises technical support. It is remotely monitored, and equipment cannot be easily unplugged – a common issue in uncontrolled environments. This approach has proven highly successful: We moved from our traditional two facility support staff to zero, said Neiberding.

Security was another major consideration. Previously, CIT's environment was so secure because it was all disconnected, disaggregated and secure by obscurity. During the transformation, security was at the forefront, and using Cisco technology ensures the institute conforms with protected-level data standards. Previously plagued by shadow IT, CIT now employs active monitoring along with a standardised system that controls classroom admittance – both virtually and physically at the Woden campus. The system also manages platform access and generates alerts when unauthorised devices are plugged into the network.

It's also enabled us to fix our identity systems, Neiberding said. Trying to unify four separate identity systems had previously been a significant challenge, but adopting Cisco's identity platform resolved the issue. The integration layer ensures that a student or teacher has access to the right room at the right time. This capability extends to other resources, such as lockers. For instance, a fashion and textiles student might require a locker for an entire semester to store a mannequin, whereas other students may only need temporary storage while on campus.

The need for integration showed the importance of the CIT-Cisco partnership. CIT uses the Moodle learning management system and the TimeEdit academic operations platform. In response, Cisco prioritised changes to its Moodle integration, ensuring it worked harmoniously alongside these applications rather than attempting to override room management and virtual classroom links. We have seen that we can influence a multinational like Cisco through this partnership to really support the outcomes of our students, Neiberding observed.

Harnessing telemetry for space utilisation

The technology changes have also led to unexpected safety and accessibility improvements. In the commercial kitchen, for example, students previously had to crowd around a teacher's bench to observe techniques. Now, a 360-degree camera zooms in on the demonstration, allowing students to watch the screens safely from their own workstations. It's quite incredible what the technology has enabled in this space, added Neiberding.

Additionally, the institute has abandoned lapel microphones, which teachers hate. Instead, directional microphones in the rooms focus on the speaker and filter out background noise. Furthermore, the Cisco hardware provides valuable classroom telemetry. While it monitors air quality and noise, the key metric for CIT is occupancy. We need to maximise utilisation, Neiberding said, noting that real-time visibility into actual class attendance is valuable.

This telemetry is particularly advantageous when upgrading older campuses that lack dedicated building management systems. With built-in sensors, CIT gains occupancy insights without needing staff to conduct manual audits. Rooms are initially scheduled based on expected enrolment numbers, but ready access to actual attendance data means classes can be dynamically relocated to more appropriately sized rooms.

We have five computer labs at Woden, and I can see their utilisation runs at around 95%, which tells me we are hitting capacity, Neiberding said. By contrast, some general learning spaces operate at around 40%. Those insights and intelligence enable us to make decisions that improve outcomes and access to the right resources at the right time.

As CIT aims to help upskill Australia's workforce in response to changing job roles, Neiberding believes the Cisco partnership will play a key role. Wouldn't it be great not to have to come onto campus to do the AI basics skills uplift or learn how to supplement your current work using the right AI tool?

This transformation at CIT demonstrates how thoughtful technology standardisation, combined with a strong partnership ethos, can revolutionise an educational institution. By moving from a fragmented, department-driven approach to a unified, student-centred model, CIT has not only improved classroom utilization and security but also created a more inclusive learning environment that meets the diverse needs of modern students. The focus on hybrid delivery ensures that access to education is not limited by physical presence, helping to break down barriers for neurodivergent learners and others who may struggle with traditional attendance.

The success of the Woden campus has already prompted CIT to consider rolling out similar models across its other campuses. Neiberding and his team are now exploring how to extend these benefits to off-campus learning environments, potentially through portable kits that replicate the standardised classroom experience. The ability to monitor occupancy and air quality in real time also opens up possibilities for more efficient energy management and building maintenance, further reducing operational costs.

Ultimately, the CIT case study offers valuable lessons for other TAFE institutions and universities worldwide. It shows that digital transformation in education is not just about buying new hardware; it requires a holistic strategy that integrates technology, pedagogy, and support services. The partnership with Cisco allowed CIT to co-design solutions that genuinely address the needs of students and staff, rather than imposing a one-size-fits-all approach. As workforce demands continue to evolve, such agile and inclusive learning environments will become increasingly essential for skilling the next generation.

Source: ComputerWeekly.com News

Speaking at the Dell Technologies World conference in Las Vegas, Dell’s global chief technology officer, John Roese, outlined the paradigm shift. “We have shifted our assumption that the use of AI is no longer a one-shot task like a chatbot,” he said. “It’s about handing objectives to the AI system, and that’s what agents do today.” As an example, he pointed to Google’s redesigned search engine, which uses multiple agents to search, compile, and build a results page based on a single objective.

The implication is profound: enterprises are tearing up old generative AI use cases and rebuilding them as agentic workflows. The user experience improves dramatically—humans become instructors rather than doers—but the underlying architecture must adapt. This article explores the key dimensions of that transformation, from hardware requirements to data strategies, cost management, and the human dynamics that ultimately determine success.

Busting the GPU training myth

During the initial AI boom, enterprises rushed to secure thousands of GPUs for model training. Roese argues that this is largely a myth for most businesses. “The myth out there is that enterprises need thousands of GPUs,” he said. “Our biggest workload inside of Dell only sits on 16 GPUs and supports 40,000 people. You don’t need thousands of GPUs in an enterprise, because for each workload, agent or project, you only need a handful of GPUs, sometimes half a GPU.”

The reason is that enterprise AI estates are shifting from training to inference. Agents do not require model training; they rely solely on inference—running pre-trained models to make predictions or decisions. That changes the hardware equation. When enterprises built simple chatbots, the architecture placed a very light load on CPUs. But agentic AI is different. Agents use external tools, communication protocols, knowledge graphs, and other components that do not naturally live inside a GPU.

“When you move to agentic, it’s almost balanced,” Roese explained. “The number of CPUs and GPUs are very similar—about maybe for every two GPUs you have a CPU. You don’t just build an AI infrastructure with a pile of GPUs—you build it with GPUs and traditional CPU compute.” This balance is a critical insight for IT planners who might otherwise overinvest in GPU capacity while neglecting the supporting compute that agents rely on.

Air-gapped frontier models and the edge

Another major shift is in how powerful AI models are deployed. A year ago, the most capable frontier models were only accessible through cloud APIs. Today, hyperscalers such as Google, AWS, and Microsoft allow top-tier models to run on-premise through services like Google Distributed Cloud. Roese noted that this opens up new deployment topologies. “You can consume it in a virtual private cloud or your datacentre, and you can air-gap it from everything else,” he said. “We didn’t have any of those options, except the API one, a year ago.”

At the same time, AI is moving to the edge in a structured way. Agentic frameworks like OpenClaw that run natively on devices and AI PCs have emerged. “Those have finally put some structure around running agents on devices, and that’s incredibly powerful, and not a fad,” Roese said. This means enterprises can deploy AI agents in remote locations, retail stores, manufacturing floor, or even on employee laptops, without relying on constant cloud connectivity. The edge deployment reduces latency, enhances privacy, and can lower bandwidth costs.

Re-architecting the data layer

Data strategies are evolving in tandem with agentic AI. Roese warned that bolting standard data storage systems onto AI compute clusters is no longer sufficient. Agentic AI demands high-speed access to context—vector databases, graph databases, and annotation tools—that must be deeply integrated into compute. “One of the performance bottlenecks is you can’t get data fast enough to the GPUs to do the work,” he said, adding that “the GPUs you’re paying for are sitting idle, waiting for data.”

To reduce latency, Dell’s AI data platform is now plumbed directly into Nvidia’s Cuda-X interfaces, effectively running data layer services at GPU speed. This kind of tight integration is becoming essential as agentic AI amplifies the need for real-time knowledge retrieval. For example, a customer service agent might need to pull up a knowledge graph of product specifications while simultaneously analyzing a user’s sentiment–all in sub-second time. Without a re-architected data layer, the agent stalls and the user experience suffers.

Organisations are also adopting data annotation pipelines that feed structured and unstructured data into vector databases. These annotations help agents understand context and make better decisions. The data layer is no longer a passive storage repository; it is an active participant in the inference process.

Mastering tokenomics and model routing

With more model deployment options come different pricing mechanisms. IT leaders must manage the cost of AI consumption, even as the cost per token is expected to decline. Roese insists that “there’s no path where it becomes cheaper to do AI”—meaning enterprises must treat AI workloads as an arbitrage game. Tokenomics, the study of token costs and usage, becomes a critical discipline.

Using specification-driven development as an example, Roese noted that if an agentic framework spawns dozens of coding tasks and blindly sends them all to top-tier frontier models, the bill will skyrocket. Instead, enterprises can implement model routing: complex planning tasks—such as creating software specifications—are sent to expensive frontier models, while routine coding tasks are routed to smaller, on-premise open-source models where energy is the only operational cost. “Building a piece of software and doing spec-driven development might have four or five different economic paths to ultimately get to the best overall economic efficiency,” said Roese.

Mastering model routing, he added, will be a competitive differentiator. Enterprises that can dynamically choose the most cost-effective model for each sub-task will achieve lower product development costs and faster iteration cycles. This requires a robust orchestration layer that can evaluate task complexity, model capability, and real-time pricing.

The human element

Ultimately, the hardest part of operationalising agentic AI relates to the human element. Roese described the traditional human job as a “container of work” that includes a mix of hygiene, productivity, coordination, and expert tasks. Agents cannot perform an entire job, but they are highly capable of executing specific types of work within that container. Dell audited 6,400 jobs across its own business to see how AI agents would impact its workforce.

“The first thing we realised is every single job in the company is going to change,” said Roese. “I’m taking work out of the job and removing stuff from the container. If the container is now only half full, do I need half the number of people, or do I expand that by half? Am I able to do more expert work?” These questions force organizations to think about job redesign, reskilling, and new roles.

The impact of AI on the workplace is so profound that change management has become a key remit of IT leadership. “For the last four months, I’ve spent 50% of my time dealing with human dynamics,” said Roese. “AI has ceased being a technology and an ROI discussion. It’s now very much an organisational and human dynamic discussion. You simply can’t use these things unless you fully understand how you’re going to adapt the human population around them.”

This means IT leaders must work closely with HR, business units, and employee representatives to design new workflows, offer training, and address anxiety. Agentic AI can remove tedious tasks, enabling workers to focus on higher-value analysis and creativity. But it also creates uncertainty. Successful adoption hinges on transparent communication and a clear vision of how AI will augment, not replace, human talent.

In summary, agentic AI is driving a comprehensive rethink of enterprise architecture. Hardware needs are shifting from GPU-heavy training clusters to balanced CPU-GPU inference systems. Data layers must be re-architected for speed and context. Tokenomics and model routing provide a way to manage costs. And the human element demands careful change management. Enterprises that adapt holistically will unlock the full potential of agentic AI, while those that treat it as just another technology rollout risk falling behind.

Source: ComputerWeekly.com News

How Widespread Is the Gap?

Data collected from 6,000 respondents across Europe by Equinix reveals that 77% of those surveyed are unworried by AI's growing role, and 57% of UK residents feel confident using it. These numbers suggest widespread embrace of the technology. Yet, when asked directly, only 33% of respondents recognized that they use AI-powered services daily. A striking 18% claimed they never use AI at all, with that figure rising to 28% in the United Kingdom. This discrepancy indicates a lack of understanding of what AI is, how it operates, and where it has already become embedded in everyday life.

The misperception is fueled by a narrow definition of AI. Many believe AI only matters when they actively log into a large language model. In reality, AI is woven into countless digital services: smartphone apps, smartwatches, email filters, calendar suggestions, streaming recommendations, online shopping prompts, navigation systems, and even health monitors. AI optimizes production lines, reduces waste, designs drug molecules that reach clinical trials in under 18 months, and helps smart home thermostats learn daily routines. The fact that so many people benefit from AI without recognizing it demonstrates how deeply the technology has already been integrated into modern life.

Demographic Disparities

The knowledge gap is not uniform. It crosses geographic boundaries but also varies by age and gender. Nearly three-quarters (72%) of people under 35 feel confident using AI, compared to only 41% of those aged 55 and above. In the UK, the gap widens further: 80% of under-35s express confidence versus just 33% of older adults. Gender differences also persist, with 62% of men feeling confident versus 50% of women.

These disparities matter because confidence often shapes participation. Those who feel less confident may be less likely to adopt new tools, access benefits, or adapt to workplace changes. Without intervention, this could lead to an ever-widening digital divide, reinforcing existing inequalities across communities. For AI to reach its full potential, governments and companies must focus on education as much as on regulation.

Why Closing the Gap Matters

If citizens do not understand how AI is already improving their lives—through better healthcare, energy efficiency, or manufacturing optimization—they may not support the policies or investments needed to sustain innovation. Public trust is essential for the long-term infrastructure, regulation, and funding that responsible AI development requires. Without that trust, progress may slow, and the benefits of AI will not be shared equitably.

The practical applications outlined earlier show that AI is not an abstract future concept but a present-day tool delivering measurable benefits. For example, AI helps track carbon intensity of the electrical grid to save costs, optimizes supply chains, enhances food quality, and makes industrial systems more efficient and sustainable. Recognizing these real-world uses is key to fostering public support.

How to Close the Gap

Governments should prioritize AI education alongside technological development. This requires both reactive and proactive thinking. Reactively, we must dispel the myth that AI is just a chatbot. Proactively, we need to build hands-on knowledge through workforce training, apprenticeships, and school curricula that equip people with the digital skills required in an AI-driven economy.

People need help understanding where AI already exists in their lives, what benefits it can deliver, and what limitations it has. Practical pathways—such as community workshops, online courses, and public awareness campaigns—can build confidence gradually. For instance, a simple demonstration of how AI improves traffic flow or recommends a film can demystify the technology.

History shows that societies that embrace new technologies quickly tend to lead the resulting industries. When the internet first emerged, it was dismissed as a fad for academics and teenagers. Today, it underpins almost every aspect of life. AI is on a faster, steeper trajectory. The window to get ahead of it is narrow. If we fail to close the knowledge gap, we risk falling behind in innovation, economic growth, and social equity.

Implications for the Workforce

The AI knowledge gap also affects the IT skills pipeline. As AI becomes integral to business operations, companies need workers who understand not just how to use AI tools but how to build, maintain, and govern them. Without public understanding, enrollment in AI-related courses may remain low, and the talent shortage could worsen. Moreover, workers who feel uncertain about AI may resist automation efforts, slowing digital transformation.

Employers can play a role by offering internal training programs that explain AI fundamentals and demonstrate how new tools enhance rather than replace jobs. By fostering a culture of continuous learning, businesses can help close the gap from within.

A Path Forward

The technology is ready. AI is already delivering tangible benefits across sectors. But public understanding has not kept pace with adoption. Closing the AI Knowledge Gap requires a concerted effort from governments, educators, companies, and individuals. It means shifting the narrative from fear to familiarity, from abstraction to everyday experience. Only when everyone—regardless of age, gender, or geography—understands how AI works, where it exists, and where it is headed can we fully harness its potential.

Source: ComputerWeekly.com News

Circular IT as a strategic hedge

The most immediate way to hit a sustainability target is to reject the "rip and replace" narrative pushed by hardware vendors. The AI gold rush tempts many organizations into a premature refresh cycle, binning functional legacy hardware to make room for high-density clusters. This creates a massive "embodied carbon" spike that most corporate dashboards conveniently ignore. For AI-heavy infrastructure, manufacturing emissions can represent up to half a data centre's total lifetime footprint. When a server is decommissioned after three years despite having three more years of useful life, the carbon investment made during silicon forging is effectively flushed away.

A sophisticated "blended stack" strategy is the only pragmatic path forward. Reserve high-density, liquid-cooled clusters for the heavy lifting of inference and training, but repurpose legacy hardware for traditional business logic. Extending a server's lifespan from three years to five—or even eight—is the single most effective way to flatten the carbon curve. It avoids the manufacturing debt of new silicon and proves that an organization values resourcefulness over chasing the newest shiny object. This approach also reduces e-waste, a growing environmental concern as AI hardware upgrades accelerate worldwide.

Ending the carbon credit shell game

The biggest barrier to honesty in IT sustainability has been the market-based accounting shell game. For a decade, the industry used Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) to claim carbon neutrality, effectively balancing a coal-powered facility in one region with wind power generated a continent away. That luxury evaporated in spring 2026 with the formal publication of the UK Sustainability Reporting Standards (UK SRS). These new standards force a location-based reality: annual averages are no longer acceptable. Auditors now demand 24/7 Carbon-Free Energy (CFE) scores—an hourly match of energy draw with local, clean supply.

For a CIO, this is a massive architectural opportunity. By designing "carbon-aware" workloads that shift non-urgent training to regions where the local grid is currently at its greenest, infrastructure becomes a dynamic compliance asset rather than a static liability. This is not just about corporate citizenship; it ensures that AI agents do not become a Scope 3 liability for customers. Early adopters are already implementing software that schedules batch processing based on real-time grid carbon intensity, leveraging APIs from electricity grid operators. Such practices also help avoid peak pricing, delivering operational savings alongside sustainability gains.

Thermal reality and the death of air cooling

In the age of high-density AI, reliance on 20th-century air cooling is an operational failure. Attempting to cool a rack pulling 60 kW to 100 kW with fans is like trying to cool a blast furnace with a desk fan—loud, ineffective, and environmentally disastrous. The January 2026 update to ISO/IEC 30134-2 global efficiency standards effectively redefined what "good" looks like. A Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) of 1.5, once the industry benchmark, is now a sign of legacy drag. Achievable targets now rely on direct-to-chip or immersion cooling. By moving PUE toward 1.1, organizations not only cut energy consumption but also gain operational resilience.

Liquid-cooled systems prevent thermal throttling, which quietly degrades AI performance during grid stress. In a world of volatile energy prices, a 40% reduction in cooling power is more than a sustainability win; it is a significant hedge against operational cost spikes. If infrastructure is not liquid, sustainability targets are not defensible. Moreover, liquid cooling reduces water usage in many designs, addressing the growing scrutiny of water consumption in data centres—a key concern in drought-prone regions. Newer two-phase immersion cooling even achieves near-zero water use while enabling higher chip densities.

Build sustainability into your competitive edge

How does this create a differentiator? In 2026, every organization is "doing AI." The differentiator is no longer the model you use, but the efficiency-per-token at which you run it. As mandatory reporting begins to bite across the supply chain, customers are looking for partners who will not bloat their own environmental reports. If you can prove your AI infrastructure is lean, liquid-cooled, and location-aware, you are not just a vendor—you are a "low-carbon asset" in their stack. That transforms you into the preferred partner because you have removed the environmental friction from their digital transformation.

Setting achievable targets is not a technical impossibility; it is a management choice. It requires moving away from the performance art of global offsets and toward the gritty reality of local grid data and hardware longevity. The CIOs who succeed will be those who stop marking their own homework and start building something that stands up to the light of day. This means embedding sustainability into every layer of the AI stack—from silicon selection to software scheduling—and treating it as a core business metric rather than a compliance checkbox.

Historical context: From virtual to physical

The AI boom began with a promise of dematerialization—intelligence without physical footprint. Early cloud computing already masked energy use behind virtual abstractions. But the sheer density of AI workloads has shattered that illusion. Training a single large language model can emit as much carbon as several cars over their lifetimes, and inference—once thought trivial—now consumes significant energy when deployed at scale. The industry is only beginning to understand the full lifecycle impact, including the mining of rare earth metals for chips and the disposal of toxic e-waste. This reality has sparked a new discipline: Green AI, which researchers define as AI with optimized energy, carbon, and water efficiency.

Governments are also stepping in. Beyond the UK SRS, the European Union's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) now requires detailed disclosures on environmental impacts of digital operations. Similar regulations are emerging in Singapore, California, and other jurisdictions. This regulatory convergence means that sustainability is no longer optional for any enterprise running AI at scale. The window for voluntary action is closing; mandatory compliance is the new baseline.

Practical steps for CIOs

To operationalize these insights, CIOs should audit their current AI infrastructure for PUE, water usage, and embodied carbon. They should negotiate with cloud providers for access to granular energy data and consider colocation in regions with high renewable penetration. Pilot projects for liquid cooling in high-density racks should begin immediately, even if only a few racks are converted. On the software side, integrating carbon-aware scheduling APIs into training pipelines can reduce emissions by 15-30% with minimal impact on delivery timelines. Finally, sustainability metrics should be added to vendor scorecards and internal project reviews, ensuring that every AI initiative justifies its physical resource budget.

These measures are not just about risk mitigation; they are about capturing value in a market where customers, investors, and talent increasingly favour responsible innovators. The companies that treat sustainability as a core design constraint—rather than an afterthought—will be the ones that thrive in the age of physical AI.

Source: ComputerWeekly.com News

Announced as part of Nutanix Enterprise AI 2.7, which reached general availability this week, Nutanix Agent Gateway serves as a centralized front door for managing interactions between AI agents, large language models (LLMs), and enterprise tools. The service is designed to provide platform teams and AI developers with unified control over agent activity, access policies, and token consumption across agentic AI deployments. This move comes as organizations transition from experimental AI pilots to production-scale implementations involving hundreds or thousands of autonomous agents.

The need for such a solution stems from the rapid evolution of agentic AI. Unlike traditional AI workflows that involve simple query-response interactions, agentic AI systems operate autonomously, executing complex tasks that require continuous access to models, enterprise applications, and business data. This autonomy introduces new governance risks, including unauthorized access to sensitive tools, difficulty in tracking costs across multiple model providers, and a lack of visibility into agent behavior. Nutanix Agent Gateway aims to mitigate these risks by offering a single, centralised control point.

Centralized Front Door for Agentic AI

At its core, Nutanix Agent Gateway acts as a policy enforcement layer that sits between AI agents and the resources they need to access. It integrates with Nutanix Enterprise AI to secure interactions between agents, models, and business applications, ensuring consistent governance whether organizations use frontier models hosted in the public cloud or self-hosted private models. The service provides key capabilities such as unified observability, audit logs, and a unified API for accessing both external and self-hosted models.

Speaking at a media gathering in London, Nutanix CEO Rajiv Ramaswami emphasized the importance of controlling AI tool usage. "The industry has been evolving so rapidly, so we have focused on our own productivity experiences to drive our own product development. What we see now is widespread adoption of AI in our employee base, but the catch is that tools are getting more expensive, so with tokenisation in mind, we have looked at how to approach optimisation the right way," Ramaswami said. He stressed that organizations need to put controls on tools to define who has policy privileges to use which tools and at what times. "Simple jobs should only be executed on simple models; we need to move away from the free-for-all model that has reigned up to now."

Ramaswami also discussed how engineering teams should manage model execution at the widest level while maintaining granular focus. He called for cutting what he described as "unfettered use" of not just AI, but all cloud services. While noting that small-scale deployments may not require such management, he underscored that Nutanix's enterprise focus makes the solution relevant for large organizations facing cost and governance pressures.

Key Capabilities: Token Observability and MCP Governance

Nutanix Agent Gateway addresses the cost challenges by centralizing token observability across model providers. IT and platform teams can monitor usage, allocate costs, and control AI spending with greater precision. The visibility also helps organizations identify workloads that can be shifted to self-hosted models, reducing reliance on external services and optimizing costs. This is particularly valuable as AI token consumption becomes a major budget line item for enterprises.

The service also introduces governance for Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, enabling cloud-native developers and operations teams to set granular access controls. This ensures that agents can securely connect to business tools and private data sources without compromising security. Key functions include:

• Unified Observability: Centralize visibility into token usage, MCP server access, and LLM activity across the organization.
• Audit Logs: Record every MCP request with a comprehensive audit trail, supporting compliance and governance requirements.
• Unified API: Access external provider models and self-hosted models through a single API, allowing developers to choose the right model for each use case without rewriting code.

Additionally, Nutanix Agent Gateway provides granular token-based rate limiting, allowing administrators to enforce token quotas and limits centrally. This delivers real-time visibility into token usage across every agent and team, helping prevent runaway costs.

Industry Context and Developer Impact

The launch of Nutanix Agent Gateway reflects broader trends in enterprise AI deployment. According to Sammy Zoghlami, SVP EMEA at Nutanix, "Organizations are rapidly moving from pilot projects to large-scale agentic AI deployments involving hundreds or even thousands of autonomous agents. Without centralised governance, it becomes difficult to control costs, access, and compliance." Zoghlami emphasized that as autonomous agents proliferate, a unified governance framework becomes essential.

From a software development perspective, Nutanix Agent Gateway offers developers both freedom and operational guardrails. By using a unified API, coders can switch between public and self-hosted models to fit the right use case without rewriting code or introducing unnecessary complexity. The centralized front door handles Model Context Protocol access, real-time token tracking, and rate limiting, allowing developers to focus on building production-scale autonomous code, agents, and connectors.

The service also supports consistent governance across hybrid environments, whether organizations rely on public cloud-hosted frontier models or on-premises, self-hosted models. IT teams benefit from unified management of access policies, governance controls, and token consumption across their AI environments. This approach aligns with Nutanix's broader strategy of simplifying hybrid multicloud operations while addressing the unique demands of AI workloads.

Nutanix has a track record of delivering infrastructure solutions that bridge on-premises and cloud environments. The company's Enterprise AI platform, now at version 2.7, provides a foundation for running AI workloads with built-in data services and security. The addition of Agent Gateway extends this platform to explicitly address the governance and cost challenges of agentic AI, a rapidly growing area of enterprise technology.

As AI agents become more sophisticated, the need for centralized control will only increase. By providing granular token observability, policy enforcement, and audit capabilities, Nutanix Agent Gateway positions itself as a critical tool for organizations seeking to scale agentic AI deployments responsibly. The service is now generally available as part of Nutanix Enterprise AI 2.7, offering enterprises a path to bring order to the complex landscape of autonomous agents and AI model consumption.

Source: Computerweekly News

This development comes after months of regulatory uncertainty and tension between the White House and leading AI labs. Earlier this year, Vice President J.D. Vance publicly endorsed a hands-off regulatory philosophy, but recent actions—including an executive order on AI security and a controversial export control directive aimed at Anthropic—have demonstrated a more interventionist posture. The upcoming standards deal appears to be a formalization of principles outlined in that executive order.

Key Facts from the Report

• The deal is expected to involve the Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI) within the Commerce Department and the National Security Agency (NSA).
• Participating companies reportedly include Anthropic, OpenAI, Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. Meta is notably absent and may be holding out.
• Standards will focus on cybersecurity capabilities of frontier AI models, including a classified benchmarking process to assess threats.
• The classified nature of the benchmarks means the public will not have full visibility into the criteria being used.
• The deal is voluntary, but the administration has shown it can enforce compliance through other regulatory tools, such as export controls.

The report, first published by the Financial Times, cites anonymous sources who claim the framework will clarify what AI companies can and cannot do regarding model safety and cyber defense. The White House has not officially commented, but the agreement follows a pattern of increasing pressure on AI developers to align with national security priorities.

In June, the U.S. government issued an export control directive to Anthropic that effectively shut down its latest publicly released model for the remainder of the month. OpenAI, fearing similar action, preemptively withheld its own newest models. These incidents created an urgent incentive for companies to negotiate acceptable standards rather than face ad hoc enforcement.

The executive order signed by President Trump earlier this year mandated the development of a “classified benchmarking process” for assessing cyber capabilities of AI models. It also defined the concept of a “covered frontier model”—a threshold beyond which additional restrictions apply. The upcoming deal is expected to operationalize these definitions and share assessments with AI developers and researchers where appropriate.

While the deal is technically voluntary, the government’s demonstrated willingness to use export controls and other punitive measures means that companies have strong incentives to comply. The involvement of the NSA underscores a focus on preventing advanced AI from being used for offensive cyber operations or falling into the hands of adversaries.

Industry insiders have expressed mixed reactions. Some executives welcome clearer rules after months of regulatory ambiguity. Others worry that classified benchmarks will create an opaque permission system that favors incumbents and stifles open-source innovation. The absence of Meta from the list of participants is particularly notable; the company has been a vocal advocate for open-source AI models and may be resisting what it sees as overly restrictive government oversight.

The deal also has implications for international competition. China is rapidly advancing its own AI capabilities, and U.S. officials want to ensure that domestic standards do not hamper American competitiveness while still protecting national security. The balance between security and innovation remains delicate.

Historically, the United States has favored a light-touch approach to technology regulation, but the unique risks posed by frontier AI—including autonomous weapon systems, mass disinformation, and cyberattacks—have forced a change. The Trump administration’s shift from complete laissez-faire to structured voluntary standards mirrors debates happening in the EU and other jurisdictions, though the U.S. approach remains less formalized than the EU's AI Act.

The coming weeks will show whether Meta joins the agreement and how transparent the benchmarking process becomes. For now, the main takeaway is that the era of unfettered AI development in the United States is giving way to a new regime of negotiated compliance—one that may set a precedent for years to come.

As the government and industry finalize the details, the public and civil society groups are likely to push for greater transparency, especially since the benchmarks will be classified. The lack of public oversight could erode trust in the system, even if the intent is to protect against genuine threats. The coming announcement will be a critical test of whether voluntary standards can effectively govern one of the most transformative technologies of the 21st century.

Source: Gizmodo News

Dean Ball, recently hired by OpenAI as Head of Strategic Futures, captured this sentiment in the Politico story. He expressed mixed feelings: "[T]here are things the administration is doing that I'm not so much of a fan of, in terms of the abruptness and the opacity and the strictness, but the more fundamental point is that I'm glad they've arrived to the conclusion that they have — to take this stuff seriously." This echoes the broader industry frustration: relief that AI is finally being treated as a serious matter, but anxiety over the unpredictable and opaque nature of the current regulatory actions.

The article draws a vivid analogy to a dentist preparing a terrified child for a painful extraction. Before even putting on a bib, the dentist holds up a tray of intimidating tools: a huge metal syringe, thick pliers with textured grips, and a flat blunt instrument that could be used to jimmy open a locked car. The message is clear: this is going to hurt. In a similar spirit, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman went before Congress in 2023 and warned, "I think if this technology goes wrong, it can go quite wrong. And we want to be vocal about that." He added, "We want to work with the government to prevent that from happening."

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, in his essay “The Adolescence of Technology,” wrote that humanity's ability to survive the coming AI turmoil “will depend on our character and our determination as a species, our spirit and our soul.” He forewarned that “the years in front of us will be impossibly hard, asking more of us than we think we can give.” These statements, whether genuine or strategic, have now proven prescient. The AI CEOs essentially said, “This is going to hurt, and we don't want to be blamed.” And they were right.

There is one crucial difference between Big AI and a dentist: America never asked Sam Altman or Dario Amodei to extract our metaphorical teeth. They arrived unbidden, without certifications, making grand promises about America's technological smile that most citizens find hard to take seriously. Yet they deserve credit for at least showing what is on the tray. And the public is not impressed. According to a survey conducted by Anthropic itself, only 15% of Americans trust AI companies to make decisions about AI development and use. Seven in ten oppose building data centers in their areas. Pessimism about AI is widespread, and a majority want development to slow down.

Perhaps most tellingly, 87% of Americans believe it is either “very likely” or “somewhat likely” that within the next 20 years, foreign governments will use AI to attack the U.S. This deep public anxiety stands in stark contrast to the Trump administration's initial signal of bold, unregulated progress. In his famous February 2025 Paris speech, Vice President JD Vance essentially declared that no regulation was coming and that everyone had better get used to it. He argued that regulation “would not only unfairly benefit incumbents in the space, it would mean paralyzing one of the most promising technologies we have seen in generations.”

Vance did not care what was on the dentist's tray. He had heard the promises of a super-smile and wanted America alone to possess it. For the most part, that has remained the administration's position. The only major brush with regulation before this month was the declaration of Anthropic as a supply chain risk—not because its AI tools were scary, but because the administration loved their potential lethality. It wanted to be told that these were the most lethal instruments in the world, whether true or just marketing, and it wanted sole control over how much lethality was meted out and where.

So it is gratifying, from a certain perspective, to finally see the Trump administration flinch at one of the dentist's tools—specifically, Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 model—and bring the unwanted dental procedure to a temporary halt. The administration's actions have resulted in an almost complete moratorium on new releases, according to Saif Khan, a former Biden administration tech advisor. He noted that this is beginning to seriously impact companies' bottom lines.

Anthropic and its chief competitor, OpenAI, are suffering together. Regarding its new GPT 5.6 series, OpenAI is attempting to reassure the public that everything is going according to plan, making the models available to a small group of VIP customers while working with the administration on a rollout framework. But behind the scenes, OpenAI is frustrated. In a blog post, the company wrote, “We don't believe this kind of government access process should become the long-term default.” An anonymous policy advisor for frontier AI companies told Politico, “It feels like they're walking on eggshells a little bit.”

Meanwhile, as cybersecurity experts have pointed out following the Fable/Mythos ban, rival labs in China will be able to capitalize on the disorder, pushing ahead with their own AI development while U.S. labs struggle to determine what is and isn't allowed. Earlier this month, the Trump administration released an Executive Order requesting—not demanding—that AI companies submit their models for federal vetting. OpenAI claims it is working with the administration to develop a repeatable process for future releases. However, the current regulation plan bypasses Congress entirely, making AI governance a matter of whether Donald Trump is pleased with what he sees. He does not like guardrails that can be jailbroken, nor does he tolerate China-linked groups gaining unauthorized access to frontier models during VIP-only periods.

Setting aside dreams of what AI might do in fanciful future scenarios, we already know what it does, and the public does not like it. We now live in the painful future that Big AI's CEOs warned about. The president has paused the dental procedure, but it looks like he is about to change next to nothing and start it back up again. The industry, the public, and the government are caught in a tense standoff, with no clear path forward.

Source: Gizmodo News

The production ramp-up at Tesla's first European factory is a clear sign that the company believes demand will continue to grow. Electrek noted that if Tesla achieves its October target, the German facility would be on track to produce approximately 390,000 electric vehicles per year. That is still below the original 500,000-vehicle annual capacity goal set when the factory opened in 2022, but it represents a significant recovery from the slowdown seen last year.

The 2025 Slump: Political Backlash and Market Decline

In 2025, Tesla's European sales suffered as Musk's increasingly hardcore conservative politics, his direct involvement in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and personal ties to then-President Donald Trump alienated many European consumers. At that time, Trump was threatening to take over Greenland and implemented tariffs on the continent. Meanwhile, Musk actively promoted far-right and anti-immigrant movements in Europe, including Germany's Alternative for Germany (AfD) party. More recently, Musk was accused of inciting violence with posts related to anti-immigrant demonstrations in Belfast.

These actions created a consumer boycott sentiment across Europe, where many buyers chose to avoid Tesla as a form of political protest. The sales decline was steep, and analysts questioned whether Tesla could ever regain its foothold in a market that values sustainability and social responsibility. However, the latest data suggests that time, combined with economic factors, has healed the wounds.

The Rebound: Economic Drivers and Consumer Behavior

Tesla registrations in Europe rose 57 percent to more than 118,000 vehicles from January through May 2026, compared with the same period in 2025, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association. This surge is being driven by rising fuel costs and new government incentives for zero-emission vehicles in Germany, Europe's largest auto market.

German consumers, in particular, are taking advantage of generous subsidies for electric vehicles, which were expanded earlier this year. The German government introduced a new bonus for buyers of EVs priced under €40,000, directly benefiting Tesla's Model 3 and Model Y, which are now manufactured locally in Berlin. The Made-in-Europe badge also helps lower the price because it avoids the import tariffs that apply to vehicles built in the United States or China.

The rebound highlights a disconnect between political rhetoric and consumer behavior. While European leaders have spent much of 2026 talking about the need to reduce dependence on American technology companies, everyday consumers are making purchase decisions based on price, convenience, and product quality.

Europe's Tech Sovereignty Drive

French President Emmanuel Macron set the tone early this year when he declared at the Munich Security Conference in February that Europe must become a geopolitical power. He emphasized the need to accelerate derisking from all big powers, particularly in defense and technology, to achieve greater independence.

France has taken concrete steps, such as banning U.S. video conferencing platforms like Microsoft Teams and Zoom for government use and switching to the French platform Visio. The French armed forces have also signed a deal to use Mistral's AI models and software. Additionally, the European Commission unveiled a comprehensive tech sovereignty package earlier this month, aimed at strengthening the bloc's digital autonomy in semiconductors, AI, cloud computing, and open-source software. The Commission also announced that it has reached a preliminary position that Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure should be regulated as gatekeepers under the Digital Markets Act, the EU's strict antitrust law for large digital platforms.

These moves signal a serious intent to reduce reliance on American big tech. However, the electric vehicle sector presents a paradox. Unlike cloud computing or social media, where European alternatives are scarce, the auto industry is one area where Europe already has strong homegrown manufacturers. Volkswagen, BMW, Stellantis, and others have invested billions in electric vehicle development. Additionally, Chinese companies like BYD have made breakthroughs in driving range and charging speed, offering European consumers more options than ever.

The Easiest Front Surrendered

The irony is not lost on analysts: electric vehicles should be the easiest sector for Europe to decouple from American technology. Yet consumers are flocking back to Tesla, the quintessential American EV brand, despite the political controversies. The reasons are practical. Tesla's vehicles offer a well-established charging network, competitive pricing thanks to local production, and a brand that still enjoys cachet among early adopters and tech enthusiasts.

European automakers, while making progress, still lag behind Tesla in aspects such as over-the-air software updates, battery efficiency, and autonomous driving features. Chinese EVs, though cheaper and increasingly advanced, face uncertainty over potential EU tariffs due to ongoing trade disputes. As a result, Tesla remains the safe and convenient choice for many European buyers.

For now, Tesla seems confident that European customers will continue to find their way back to its showrooms. The company is actively hiring and expanding production capacity, betting that the geopolitical noise will not derail its growth in the region. Whether Europe can simultaneously pursue tech sovereignty and rely on an American company for a key part of its green transition remains an open question.

The resurgence of Tesla in Europe illustrates the challenges of policy-driven consumer behavior. Governments can set targets and create incentives, but ultimately, individual car buyers vote with their wallets. And as long as Tesla offers a compelling product at a competitive price, the easiest front in the war on American big tech may remain surrendered.

Source: Gizmodo News

In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital privacy and security, early July 2026 has brought a wave of significant developments. From landmark Supreme Court decisions and corporate accountability to government surveillance expansions and cyber threats, these stories underscore the ongoing tension between convenience, innovation, and fundamental rights. This roundup extracts key headlines and facts from the most impactful events.

Supreme Court Rules Geofence Warrants Are a 'Search' Under 4th Amendment

In a major victory for privacy advocates, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 29, 2026, that geofence warrants—which compel tech companies to reveal all devices present in a defined area during a specific time—constitute a 'search' under the Fourth Amendment. The decision, written by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, stops short of declaring such warrants unconstitutional but imposes strict requirements: law enforcement must now demonstrate probable cause specific to each person targeted, not just a general geographic zone. The ruling effectively curtails the widespread use of 'reverse location searches' that have been criticized as dragnet surveillance. Legal experts note this could reshape investigative practices in cases ranging from protests to property crimes.

GoDaddy Sounds Alarm Over India Law That Could Upend Global Internet Privacy

On July 4, 2026, domain registrar GoDaddy issued a stark warning about India's proposed Digital Data Protection Act. The law would require internet intermediaries to collect and retain extensive personally identifiable information (PII) from all users—including those outside India—to comply with government requests. GoDaddy's chief privacy officer stated the law 'threatens the very concept of anonymous internet use worldwide.' If enacted, experts say it could force global companies to weaken encryption or face penalties, undermining privacy protections for millions of non-Indian users. The bill, backed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration, is seen as part of a broader trend toward digital sovereignty that clashes with universal privacy norms.

Apple’s 'Hide My Email' Feature May Leak Real Addresses

A privacy bug in Apple's iCloud+ feature 'Hide My Email' has been quietly exposing users' actual email addresses, according to reports published on July 1, 2026. Security researchers discovered that when users forward emails from their anonymized addresses to an external account, the real sender email can sometimes appear in the forwarded message headers. Apple has reportedly known about the issue since 2025 but has only partially addressed it with a patch in iOS 21. Privacy advocates criticize Apple for failing to promptly disclose the vulnerability, which could affect millions of subscribers who rely on the feature to avoid spam and tracking.

Trump Signs Executive Orders to Accelerate Quantum Computing

On June 22, 2026, President Donald Trump signed two executive orders aimed at speeding up the development of quantum computing in the United States. The orders create a policy framework for federal investment and establish a 'National Quantum Initiative Office' to coordinate research. While proponents argue quantum computing could revolutionize medicine, logistics, and cryptography, critics warn that the technology also threatens current encryption standards. The orders come just weeks after top intelligence agencies warned that quantum-powered cyberattacks could arrive within months, not years. The administration has not yet mandated post-quantum security standards for government systems.

DOJ Shuts Down Nearly 400 Sites Hosting Illegal World Cup Live Streams

The Department of Justice announced on June 29, 2026, the takedown of nearly 400 websites involved in streaming unauthorized broadcasts of the FIFA World Cup. The operation, dubbed 'Operation Offsides,' targeted sites that generated revenue through ads and malware distribution. While copyright enforcement was the immediate goal, privacy experts note that many of these sites also harvested user data through malicious scripts. The DOJ coordinated with international law enforcement agencies, reflecting the global nature of digital piracy and the increasing use of takedowns that also affect privacy.

Federal Agents Tracked Anti-ICE Activist in New York Hotel; Methods Unclear

A report on June 28, 2026, revealed that federal agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) located and arrested a father who had publicly criticized the agency in a New York hotel. How agents found him remains unclear, but possibilities include cell phone location data, facial recognition from security cameras, or cooperation from the hotel's Wi-Fi provider. Civil liberties groups condemned the tracking, arguing that even if legal, using surveillance tools to target political speech creates a chilling effect. The incident highlights the blurred line between legitimate law enforcement and government monitoring of citizens.

Xprize Founder Defends Ubiquitous Surveillance as a Tool for Good Behavior

On June 26, 2026, Xprize founder Peter Diamandis argued that the proliferation of sensors—what he calls a 'trillion-sensor world'—would encourage people to 'behave better.' His comments, made at a tech conference, drew sharp criticism from privacy advocates who note that surveillance is rarely applied equally; marginalized communities face disproportionate monitoring. The debate underscores a fundamental tension: while some see transparency as a social good, others see it as a threat to autonomy and dissent.

Hackers Steal Millions from Polymarket Users

On June 25, 2026, prediction market platform Polymarket confirmed a security breach that compromised user accounts, potentially stealing millions. The company stated it is contacting impacted users and issuing full refunds. The attack exploited a vulnerability in the platform's API, allowing hackers to drain funds from wallets connected to Polymarket. This incident follows a broader trend of crypto-related thefts, raising questions about the security of decentralized finance platforms and their commitment to user privacy.

Betting on People’s Worst Instincts: Zuckerberg’s Latest Move

On June 24, 2026, an article examined Mark Zuckerberg's history of prioritizing engagement over user welfare, from the early 'dumb fks' era to Meta's recent expansion into gambling-like prediction markets. The piece argues that Zuckerberg's latest bet—allowing users to wager on events via social media—exploits psychological vulnerabilities while collecting vast amounts of personal data. Critics say such features erode trust and invite regulatory scrutiny, especially as Meta faces ongoing privacy investigations in the EU and U.S.

Top Intel Agencies Warn AI-Driven Cyber Catastrophes Are Imminent

A joint intelligence report published on June 22, 2026, by the Five Eyes alliance warns that artificial intelligence is enabling a new generation of cyberattacks that could cause catastrophic damage within months. The report highlights AI-powered tools that automate vulnerability discovery, social engineering, and rapidly evolving malware. It specifically warns that critical infrastructure—power grids, hospitals, financial systems—is at risk. The timeline described as 'months, not years' has prompted calls for immediate investment in AI defenses and international agreements on offensive cyber capabilities.

Danish Privacy Activist Arrested for Publishing Prime Minister’s Phone Number

On June 22, 2026, Danish authorities arrested a well-known privacy activist for posting the Prime Minister's personal mobile phone number on social media. The activist argued that the PM's number was already publicly available and that the arrest was an overreaction designed to intimidate critics. The case has sparked debates about the balance between public figures' privacy and free expression. Privacy groups see it as a dangerous precedent where governments use secrecy laws to silence dissent.

France to Phase Out Non-Quantum-Safe Security Products

France announced on June 18, 2026, that it will stop certifying security products that are not resistant to quantum attacks starting next year. This aggressive move effectively forces operators of critical infrastructure—including telecommunications, finance, and energy—to transition to post-quantum cryptography. While other nations have published guidance, France is the first to use certification as a lever. The decision is expected to accelerate global adoption of quantum-safe standards, though it also imposes near-term costs on organizations that must upgrade systems.

White House App to Pre-Load on DHS Devices

On June 17, 2026, reports surfaced that the White House app will be automatically installed on all mobile devices issued by the Department of Homeland Security. The app provides 'unfiltered, real-time updates' from the administration. Critics worry that the forced installation could be used to distribute propaganda or collect usage data from federal employees. The move follows similar practices in the private sector and raises questions about political neutrality within agencies tasked with impartial law enforcement.

Signal Veterans Launch Encrypted Spaces for Slack, Google Docs

On June 14, 2026, former Signal employees unveiled 'Encrypted Spaces,' a platform that adds end-to-end encryption to popular productivity tools like Slack, Google Docs, and Notion. The service uses a combination of client-side encryption and zero-knowledge storage, meaning even the provider cannot access user content. The founders emphasize that existing cloud collaboration tools leave data exposed to both hackers and the companies themselves. Encrypted Spaces aims to bring the same privacy guarantees that Signal provides for messaging to the broader workplace ecosystem.

AI Facial Recognition Leads to False Arrests in Florida

On June 12, 2026, a detailed investigation revealed multiple cases in Florida where faulty AI facial recognition software caused innocent people to be arrested. The software, used by several police departments, mistakenly matched individuals to surveillance footage of crimes they did not commit. Those arrested spent days in jail before being released, but their mugshots and records continue to circulate online, causing lasting harm. The report underscores the dangers of deploying unregulated predictive algorithms in law enforcement without safeguards for accuracy and human oversight.

Congress Fails to Reauthorize Section 702 Surveillance Law

On June 11, 2026, Congress failed to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which expired at midnight Friday. The law allows warrantless surveillance of non-Americans abroad but incidentally collects Americans' communications. Privacy advocates celebrated the expiration, though they fear it will be revived with minimal reforms. Senator Ron Wyden said, 'Every day that Section 702 is in effect without reforms is a day that Americans’ rights are under threat.' The expiration creates a temporary gap in intelligence collection, but the political battle over privacy and security continues.

White House Defangs AI-Testing Unit

On June 10, 2026, the Trump administration quietly directed the Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CASI) to stop publishing its model reviews. CASI had been testing AI systems for safety flaws, including bias and vulnerability to misuse. The directive effectively silences an independent watchdog at a time when AI adoption is accelerating across sectors. Critics argue this leaves consumers and companies without critical information about the risks of AI products, and may invite regulatory chaos if model failures become widespread.

Democrats Push for Military AI Restriction Law

Following revelations that Anthropic's AI was used by the Pentagon for targeting simulations, three Democratic senators introduced bills on June 9, 2026, to ban fully autonomous weapons. The proposed legislation would require human oversight for any lethal decision-making by AI systems. The move comes amid growing bipartisan concern about the militarization of AI and the lack of international treaties governing autonomous warfare. Proponents argue that banning 'killer robots' is essential to prevent accidental escalations and to maintain ethical standards in warfare.

Source: Gizmodo News

Mercedes' Kimi Antonelli secured pole position for Sunday's main race, which starts at 15:00 BST. Live commentary is available on BBC Sounds. The circuit, straddling the Northamptonshire and Buckinghamshire border, is famed for its high-speed corners and rich racing heritage, attracting fans who describe it as a place where "true petrolhead passion" thrives.

International fans flock to Silverstone

Guillermo and his children travelled from Nogales, Mexico, to experience the event's unique atmosphere. For his 14-year-old daughter Rebecca, the trip is part of her Quinceañera celebration — a traditional Mexican 15th birthday. "It [Silverstone] is very comfortable," she said. "Everything is happy. The people are very good and welcoming." Her 16-year-old brother, also named Guillermo, plans to wave the Mexican flag for Sergio Perez but admitted he supports Lewis Hamilton too. "I wish him to get first place," he said. "We're loving the racing, loving Silverstone. It's pretty nice. I love F1."

Oscar Solimano, 33, from Argentina, is part of a group of 11 fans supporting Alpine driver Franco Colapinto. "We came over on Wednesday, staying at a house in Oxford, and have had this planned for months. We are big petrolheads, that's why we're here," he said. "It [Silverstone] is incredible. It's one of those places where you say, 'hey, there's a true petrolhead passion here.' It's not like other circuits; here you breathe cars and motorsport."

Charlie Bingham, 51, originally from the UK but now living in Texas, attended with his wife and children. "It's a bit of a splurge, but great to be here," he said. "My wife and I made it our 50th birthday present to one another. The kids have got into F1 in the last couple of years. This is the home of Grand Prix, so why not?"

Family traditions and new fans

Father and son Stuart and Ross returned for the 2025 race with tickets in the Hangar grandstand. "It's just the whole scale of the event," said 52-year-old Stuart. "It's bigger than just a race. There's something for everyone." Ross, 21, a McLaren fan, expects Antonelli to win but hopes for an all-British podium. "I think Mercedes look like they're going to do it. It would be nice to see Hamilton up there, and Lando Norris too."

The 77th edition of the British Grand Prix is also attracting first-time attendees. Liz Williams, 70, from Aberystwyth, attended her first Formula 1 race after her grandchildren sparked her interest. She found Saturday's sprint race thrilling. "It was really exciting when they were all overtaking one another on the corner where we were. There are lots of people cheering different drivers, but it's all very friendly. Nobody's fighting or pushing as in some sports."

Colin Lawson, 59, from Aberdeen, is camping at Whittlebury Park with friends and family in his RV. "It's my happy place," he said. "I love it because it's British. It's a gathering. We've had a journey to get here, but it's all about fun. Silverstone is probably the pinnacle of the year."

Silverstone's heritage and modern appeal

Silverstone's role in Formula 1 history is unparalleled. The first Grand Prix on 13 May 1950 saw Giuseppe Farina win in an Alfa Romeo. The circuit evolved from a wartime airfield into a racing icon, hosting the British Grand Prix every year since except for a brief period in the 1960s. Its high-speed corners like Copse, Maggotts, Becketts, and Stowe have tested generations of drivers. The track's layout demands precision and courage, making it a favourite among drivers and fans alike.

Beyond the racing, the weekend features headline music acts such as David Guetta and Richard Ashcroft, stand-up comedy from Jack Whitehall, and extensive fan zones. Ticket prices vary: Sunday's race starts from £229, with three-day general admission from £269. Camping options accommodate over 7,000 fans, with many arriving as early as Wednesday to soak in the atmosphere.

As the race approaches, the buzz around Silverstone is palpable. The combination of history, high-speed action, and passionate fans from across the globe cements the British Grand Prix as a must-attend event in the Formula 1 calendar. Whether cheering for home heroes or international talents, the crowd's unity in their love for motorsport defines the experience.

Source: MSN News

This article explores the evolving style narratives of five celebrated father-son duos: Shah Rukh Khan and Aryan Khan, Saif Ali Khan and Ibrahim Ali Khan, Jackie Shroff and Tiger Shroff, Amitabh Bachchan and Abhishek Bachchan, and Aamir Khan and Junaid Khan. Through detailed analysis, we highlight how each pair balances classic elegance with contemporary trends, proving that great style is not just about clothes—it's about attitude, legacy, and personal expression.

Shah Rukh Khan & Aryan Khan: Classic Meets Contemporary

Shah Rukh Khan, often called the 'King of Bollywood,' is a fashion icon whose style has evolved from the romantic hero of the 1990s to a suave, sophisticated star. His wardrobe blends traditional Indian wear—like bandhgalas and kurta sets—with sharp Western suits. Abd, his off-screen look is equally polished: think tailored blazers, classic denim, and the signature tousled hair. Aryan Khan, his elder son, has carved his own niche in the fashion world. Known for his understated luxury aesthetic, Aryan often opts for monochrome outfits, oversized silhouettes, and statement jackets. While he maintains a low-key profile, his airport appearances and public outings reveal a refined taste that mirrors his father's elegance but with a modern twist. Together, they represent a seamless transition from Bollywood royalty to contemporary street-style credibility.

Saif Ali Khan & Ibrahim Ali Khan: Royal Lineage Meets Modern Sophistication

Saif Ali Khan, the Nawab of Pataudi, has always been a trendsetter in Bollywood menswear. His style is deeply rooted in his royal heritage—he often wears impeccable suits, silk scarves, and classic watches. But he also embraces experimental looks, like metallic jackets or floral blazers. Ibrahim Ali Khan, poised to enter the film industry, has inherited not only his father's handsome features but also his sartorial sensibilities. Ibrahim's style is youthful yet polished: well-fitted jeans, crisp shirts, and tailored blazers. He often draws inspiration from his father's classic choices while adding his own relaxed vibe. The pair's appearances at family functions and fashion events highlight a shared love for clean lines and sophisticated accessories.

Jackie Shroff & Tiger Shroff: Rugged Charm and Athleisure Energy

Jackie Shroff's on-screen persona has always been about raw, rugged appeal. His off-screen style matches that image—think loose shirts, bandhnis, and a carefree attitude. Over the years, he has become known for his unique sense of layering and his ability to pull off silver hair and a laid-back demeanour. Tiger Shroff, his son, represents the new-age fitness icon. His fashion is heavily influenced by his athletic lifestyle: athleisure wear, sports shoes, and fitted T-shirts are staples. Yet, he also experiments with bold patterns and streetwear. While Jackie prefers comfort and tradition, Tiger favours modernity and performance wear. Together, they highlight how style can be both inherited and reinvented across generations.

Amitabh Bachchan & Abhishek Bachchan: Timeless Elegance and Contemporary Flair

Amitabh Bachchan is arguably Bollywood's most enduring style icon. His wardrobe is a masterclass in elegance: sharp suits, embroidered bandhgalas, and classic shawls. He is known for his deep baritone, but his sartorial sense is equally commanding. Abhishek Bachchan has developed his own polished style over the years, often seen in tailored blazers, well-fitted jeans, and formal wear. While Amitabh leans towards classic silhouettes that exude authority, Abhishek mixes traditional pieces with modern cuts. Both men embody the philosophy that style is about confidence and timelessness.

Aamir Khan & Junaid Khan: Understated Authenticity

Aamir Khan has long been the thinking actor's icon, and his style reflects his personality. He rarely follows trends, instead opting for clean, minimal looks that prioritize comfort and functionality. Neutral colours, well-fitted shirts, and simple jackets define his public appearances. Junaid Khan, who made his acting debut recently, carries forward that minimalistic approach. His street style is refreshingly unpretentious: basic tees, classic denim, and neutral-toned outerwear. Neither father nor son seeks attention through flashy garments; their fashion statements are subtle yet impactful. This duo champions authenticity over extravagance, proving that less is often more in the world of high-fashion indulgences.

These five pairs represent the broader spectrum of Bollywood fashion, where style is passed down not just through genes but through shared aesthetics and values. Each father-son duo adds its own chapter to the ever-evolving story of Indian men's fashion, inspiring generations to dress with intention and confidence.

Source: Filmibeat News

Nearly six months later, Johnson has opened up about her exit in an interview on the podcast The Downside with Gianmarco Soresi. She explained that there was no single reason for leaving; rather, it was a culmination of many factors that had been weighing on her mind. “There wasn’t one particular thing, unfortunately. It was like a lot of things and had been something that was on my mind for a while,” she said. Johnson expressed gratitude for her WWE experience, stating she would not change it for the world and that she got to live out her childhood dream. But ultimately, she felt it was time for something new and different. “I don’t regret leaving, and I’m really happy now,” she added.

Since her departure, Johnson has shifted her focus to working alongside her mother, Dany Garcia, who is a prominent businesswoman and co-founder of Seven Bucks Companies. In the same interview, Johnson discussed the possibility of returning to WWE in the future. She acknowledged that a certain degree of return is always possible but expressed uncertainty about wanting to participate in entertainment at the scale she did with WWE. “I feel like so much of my life was public for so long. I’m not sure if I would want to participate in entertainment in the scale that I did when I was at WWE,” she said. She now enjoys creating travel vlogs and engaging with an audience on her own terms, finding a balance between being public and maintaining privacy.

Johnson’s journey in WWE began at the Performance Center, where she trained as a wrestler under the name Ava Raine. As a member of the renowned Anoa’i wrestling family, she carried significant expectations. Her father, The Rock, is one of the most iconic figures in professional wrestling and Hollywood. Her grandfather, High Chief Peter Maivia, and her uncles, Afa and Sika Anoa’i, are also revered in the industry. Johnson made her main roster debut as part of Joe Gacy’s Schism, a faction that blended psychological drama with in-ring action. She later became the general manager of NXT, where she oversaw storylines and talent development.

The decision to leave WWE is especially significant given the intense public scrutiny that comes with being the daughter of The Rock. Johnson’s every move was watched by fans and media, placing her under a microscope from a young age. Her time in WWE saw high expectations for her to follow in her father’s footsteps, but she chose to carve her own path. The pressure to succeed in a family known for its wrestling legacy can be immense, and Johnson’s candid remarks shed light on the challenges of living up to a famous surname while trying to establish individual identity.

Beyond her personal journey, Johnson’s exit reflects broader trends in professional wrestling, where younger talent increasingly seek opportunities outside the ring. The shift towards brand building, content creation, and personal ventures has become common among wrestlers. Johnson’s move to work with her mother in business allows her to explore new avenues without the constraints of a full-time wrestling schedule. Her mother, Dany Garcia, is not only a manager but also a successful entrepreneur and producer, giving Johnson a solid foundation for a career beyond WWE.

The timing of Johnson’s departure also aligns with a period of change within WWE itself. The company has undergone significant transformations under new leadership, including mergers and rebranding efforts. Many wrestlers and staff have reconsidered their roles in the evolving landscape. Johnson’s decision could be seen as part of a larger movement toward greater autonomy and alternative career paths.

Johnson’s comments about her future involvement in entertainment indicate a desire for a more measured public life. She appreciates the creative outlet of making travel vlogs, which allows her to share experiences without the high-pressure environment of live television. This approach reflects a growing preference among celebrities to control their own narratives through social media and digital platforms.

The Anoa’i family continues to be a dominant force in wrestling, with members like Roman Reigns and Nia Jax maintaining prominent roles. However, Johnson’s departure from WWE does not sever her ties to the industry. She remains a part of this storied lineage, and her experiences could inform future projects, whether in entertainment, business, or other fields.

In the end, Johnson’s story is one of self-discovery and prioritizing personal happiness over external expectations. Her willingness to speak openly about her decision provides valuable insight into the complexities of being a second-generation performer. As she moves forward, Johnson is focused on building a life that feels authentic to her, free from the constraints of a predetermined path.

Source: Yahoo Sports News

During his long WWE career, Cena typically sported a buzz cut, keeping his hair short and manageable for the grueling schedule. However, after his return in 2024, fans noticed he had adopted a slicked-back combover that seemed designed to cover a growing bald spot. The audience, ever observant, quickly turned the bald spot into a running joke, bringing signs to events that playfully referenced his hair loss. In an interview with People Magazine, Cena reflected on that experience: “As I was trying to hide my hair loss, the audience was bringing it to light. I saw their signs that said ‘The bald John Cena…’ I hate the fact that if there wasn’t so much shame around it, I’d have gotten it done 10 years ago. I thought I was alone, but seven or eight out of 10 [men] suffer from thinning or baldness.”

Cena’s openness about his hair transplant has been praised by fans and medical professionals alike. The FUE (Follicular Unit Extraction) procedure he underwent is a modern technique where individual hair follicles are extracted from a donor area and transplanted to thinning regions. His decision to shave his head completely during the recovery process is not unusual; it allows for easier healing and monitoring of the new grafts. This marks the first time since 1998—when he was a student at Springfield College in Massachusetts—that Cena has been seen with a completely bald head.

A Career Built on Visibility

John Cena’s wrestling persona is built around the idea of being invisible—his signature taunt “You can’t see me” combined with a hand wave in front of his face became one of the most iconic gestures in sports entertainment. Yet off-screen, Cena has always been highly visible, not only as a wrestler but as a philanthropist, actor, and public figure. Debuting in WWE in 2002, he quickly rose to fame with a rapper gimmick and soon became a top star. He holds a record 16 world championship reigns (tied with Ric Flair) and has headlined multiple WrestleManias. After stepping back from full-time wrestling, Cena transitioned to Hollywood, landing major roles in films like Trainwreck, Bumblebee, and the HBO Max series Peacemaker. His career has been marked by relentless hard work and a positive public image, making his recent hair loss journey a relatable and humanizing moment for fans.

Hair Loss and Modern Masculinity

Cena’s candidness touches on a broader conversation about male pattern baldness and the stigma surrounding it. Hair loss affects a majority of men by age 50, yet many feel shame or pressure to hide it. By sharing his own story, Cena has helped normalize hair restoration procedures. The FUE treatment he underwent is one of the least invasive options, with a relatively short recovery time. The second round—which he described as “all in”—suggests he is aiming for dense, natural-looking results. While it is unlikely the Peacemaker actor will stay bald long-term—since the treatment is meant to fill out the entire scalp with hair—the current shaved look has become a topic of widespread discussion on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Reddit.

Fans have reacted with a mix of surprise, support, and humor. Many pointed out that he looked completely different, almost unrecognizable, while others applauded his bravery in showing the process. Some drew comparisons to other bald celebrities like Dwayne Johnson, though The Rock has always been bald by choice. Cena’s decision to go fully bald during the transplant recovery period also protects the grafts from UV damage and reduces the risk of infection. Dermatologists recommend that patients avoid sun exposure and keep the scalp clean during the first few months after surgery.

What’s Next for John Cena?

Although Cena has indicated his wrestling days are winding down—he retired from WWE in 2024—he remains active in entertainment. He is set to star in upcoming film projects and continues to host the reality show Wipeout. The timeline for his full hair growth is typically six to twelve months, meaning fans may see a gradual return of his signature slicked-back style by late 2025 or early 2026. For now, the bald John Cena is a temporary but fascinating moment in pop culture. His willingness to document the process—including the initial combover phase and now the fully shaved head—has turned a personal medical decision into a public spectacle of vulnerability and authenticity.

In the end, Cena’s hair transplant story is more than just a celebrity gossip item; it reflects changing attitudes toward aging, appearance, and the choices men make to feel confident. By stripping away the hair—literally and figuratively—Cena has shown that even the most confident superstars face insecurities. And in typical John Cena fashion, he has turned that insecurity into a teachable moment. As he told People: “I don’t think there’s any shame in that. It completely changed the course of my life.”

This is not the first time a WWE superstar has undergone a noticeable physical transformation. Wrestlers like The Undertaker, Kane, and Chris Jericho have all changed their looks multiple times to refresh their characters. But Cena’s change is particularly poignant because it is not for a storyline—it is for his own personal well-being. The fact that he allowed cameras to capture the combover phase, and now the bald phase, shows a level of transparency rarely seen from top-tier celebrities. It also humanizes a man who has spent two decades in the spotlight as an almost superhuman figure. Whether he grows back a full head of hair or decides to keep the bald look, John Cena has once again managed to capture the public’s attention—and this time, it’s not because of a championship belt or a blockbuster movie, but because of a decision to be honest about his hair.

Fans will eagerly watch his progress, and if history is any guide, Cena will soon be back to his smiling, energetic self—hair or no hair. The catchphrase “You can’t see me” may take on a new meaning for a while, but rest assured, John Cena will still be impossible to ignore.

Source: MSN News

Bill Gates' life and legacy took a dramatic turn after his ties to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein were publicly exposed. What began as a series of interactions in the early 2010s has now triggered a crisis at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, one of the world's largest philanthropic organizations. In January 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) released the Epstein Files—a trove of 3 million pages of documents, along with thousands of photographs and videos. These files revealed the extent of Epstein's social network and his interactions with powerful figures, including Gates.

Gates was reportedly mentioned extensively in these files, damaging his public persona and, according to a recent report from The Daily Beast, now affecting his business and philanthropic dealings. The most significant fallout is the apparent strain in his long-standing friendship with billionaire Warren Buffett, chairman of Berkshire Hathaway. Sources close to Buffett have told The Wall Street Journal that the 95-year-old has paused his usual hefty annual donations to the Gates Foundation amid the ongoing internal probe into Gates' relationship with Epstein.

Buffett's Historic Pledge

To understand the magnitude of this development, one must look back at the remarkable philanthropic pledge Buffett made in 2006. He promised to donate 85% of his Berkshire Hathaway stock to five foundations, with the bulk—about 83%—going to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Over the years, Buffett has donated approximately $48 billion to the foundation, making him its single largest contributor. The donations were structured as annual gifts, typically around late June. This year, for the first time in 20 years, Buffett has decided to withhold that donation.

According to insiders, Buffett has also been in contact with the foundation's leadership, specifically asking CEO Mark Suzman about the progress of the internal investigation into Gates' past associations. Buffett's own public statements in March 2026 hinted at this uncertainty. During an interview on CNBC's Squawk Box with Becky Quick, Buffett said he had not spoken to Gates since the Epstein Files were released. When asked whether he would continue his donations, he replied, 'Well, yeah, actually, I agreed to do it every year, but I’ve done it around June 30 most of the time, and I’ll wait and see what unfolds.'

A History of Friendship and Philanthropy

Buffett and Gates first met in the early 1990s, and over the decades they forged one of the most influential partnerships in modern philanthropy. Together, they launched the Giving Pledge in 2010, encouraging billionaires to commit to giving away the majority of their wealth. Their friendship was built on mutual respect and a shared passion for tackling global issues such as disease, poverty, and education. Gates often spoke of Buffett as a mentor, and the two were frequent bridge partners.

However, the bond began to fray after Gates' divorce from Melinda French Gates in 2021, which itself was partly linked to concerns over Gates' relationship with Epstein. The release of the Epstein Files in 2026 has further exposed the depth of Gates' involvement with the disgraced financier. Epstein was arrested in 2019 on federal charges of sex trafficking of minors, and he died by suicide in prison shortly thereafter. For years, rumors circulated that Gates had attended social events with Epstein, and the files confirmed many of those interactions.

Gates' Apology and Internal Fallout

In the wake of the DOJ release, Gates held a candid meeting with the staff of the Gates Foundation to address the situation. He admitted that it was a 'huge mistake' to spend time with Epstein. According to a report by Leisurebyte, Gates also referenced his extramarital affairs, including with a Russian bridge player and a Russian nuclear physicist. He claimed that Epstein used knowledge of these affairs to blackmail him into continuing their association. Gates stated emphatically, 'I did nothing illicit. I saw nothing illicit.' Nonetheless, the damage to his reputation and the foundation's operations has been substantial.

The Gates Foundation board has launched a thorough internal probe, which is looking into the extent and nature of Gates' contacts with Epstein. The timing of this investigation—coinciding with Buffett's decision to pause his donation—has raised questions about whether the foundation's long-term funding will be affected. Buffett's donations alone represent a significant portion of the foundation's annual budget. In 2023, the foundation reported assets of over $75 billion, but much of that is committed to ongoing grants and programs.

Wider Implications for Philanthropy and Trust

The controversy surrounding Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein extends beyond just one man's reputation. It also raises broader ethical questions about how mega-philanthropists are vetted and held accountable. The Gates Foundation has long been celebrated for its work in global health, eradicating polio, and funding malaria research. But the scandal threatens to overshadow these achievements and erode public trust in large-scale philanthropy. If Warren Buffett, a man known for his integrity and simple lifestyle, finds it necessary to publicly distance himself, the ripple effects could be felt across the entire sector.

Furthermore, the case highlights the danger of associating with controversial figures. Epstein was a master manipulator who used his wealth and connections to ingratiate himself with the rich and powerful. Many other prominent figures—including Prince Andrew, former President Bill Clinton, and even scientists and academics—have been tarnished by their links to Epstein. For Gates, the fallout may be particularly painful because he built a second career as a global benefactor after Microsoft, and his foundation is a testament to his desire to make a positive impact.

Buffett's move also signals a willingness to hold even close friends accountable. The 95-year-old investor has been careful to avoid controversy throughout his life, and he appears determined not to let this episode damage his own legacy. In previous interviews, Buffett has spoken warmly of Gates' intelligence and dedication. But the Epstein connections have forced a reckoning. Whether or not Buffett resumes his donations after the investigation concludes remains to be seen, but the message is clear: trust is fragile and must be earned consistently.

The Road Ahead for the Gates Foundation

For the Gates Foundation, the immediate priority is completing its internal probe and regaining the confidence of donors and the public. CEO Mark Suzman has acknowledged the seriousness of the situation and promised transparency. But without Buffett's annual contribution—estimated at over $3 billion for 2026—the foundation may have to adjust its spending priorities or rely more heavily on its endowment.

Bill Gates himself has largely retreated from public view in recent months, focusing on his work with Breakthrough Energy and other ventures. The release of the Epstein Files has also reignited calls for greater scrutiny of the power wielded by billionaire philanthropists. Some critics argue that such wealth should be subject to more democratic oversight, especially when it influences global health policy.

As the foundation navigates this difficult period, one thing is certain: the era when Bill Gates operated beyond reproach is over. His admission that it was a 'huge mistake' to spend time with Epstein may be sincere, but it cannot undo the damage to his reputation or the challenging questions now facing his foundation. The story of Gates, Buffett, and Epstein is a cautionary tale about the price of influence and the enduring power of a single association.

Source: MSN News

Some handhelds are designed for quick sessions and classic libraries, prioritizing simplicity, long battery life and pocketable designs. Others blur the line between console and PC, offering large screens, powerful chips and access to massive game libraries, often at the cost of size, price or endurance. There are even more experimental options that focus on unusual controls or intentionally limited experiences.

We've spent months testing and tracking the fast-moving handheld space to figure out which devices are actually worth your money right now. Whether you're looking for a versatile all-rounder, a premium portable gaming PC or a dedicated machine for retro games, these are the gaming handhelds that stand out in an increasingly crowded field.

Best handheld gaming devices for 2026

Best handheld gaming PC for most

Steam Deck

Steam Deck OLED – Display: 7.4-inch HDR OLED, 1,280 x 800 resolution, 1,000 nits peak HDR brightness, 600 nits SDR brightness, up to 90Hz | Processor: Custom 6nm AMD APU | RAM: 16GB LPDDR5 6400 MT/s | Storage: 512GB, 1TB SSD | Battery: 50Whr | Dimensions: 11.73 x 4.6 x 1.93 inches | Weight: 1.41 pounds | Wireless: Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3 | OS: SteamOS

Steam Deck LCD – Display: 7-inch IPS, 1,280 x 800 resolution, 400 nits brightness, 60Hz | Processor: Custom 7nm AMD APU | RAM: 16GB LPDDR5 5500 MT/s | Storage: 256GB SSD | Battery: 40Whr | Dimensions: 11.73 x 4.6 x 1.93 inches | Weight: 1.48 pounds | Wireless: Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.0 | OS: SteamOS

Three years into its life, Valve's Steam Deck remains the best balance of price, performance and usability in the gaming handheld market. More specifically, the Steam Deck OLED is a thorough upgrade over the original. Starting at $549 for 512GB of storage, this model features a 7.4-inch OLED display that's brighter, faster, slightly bigger and more vivid than the 7-inch IPS panel on the entry-level model. The higher contrast and richer colors of an OLED screen makes every game look better by default, but this display also supports HDR, with significantly brighter highlights. The maximum refresh rate jumps from 60Hz to 90Hz as well, which helps many games look smoother in motion.

Due to the less power-hungry display, a more efficient AMD APU and a larger battery, the Steam Deck OLED also lasts longer than the original. No handheld can play resource-intensive "AAA" games for very long, but Valve says the OLED model can run for three to 12 hours depending on the game, whereas the LCD model lasts between two and eight. A larger fan keeps things cooler and quieter, and the chassis feels lighter. Performance is roughly the same, though the OLED model's increased memory bandwidth can help it gain a couple extra frames in certain games.

Still, $549 isn't a small investment. The entry-level Steam Deck may come with a more basic LCD display and a smaller 256GB SSD, but it delivers the same core experience for $150 less. At $399, it continues to be a strong bargain. Consider that model our pick for the best "budget" handheld gaming PC you can buy.

To be clear, either Steam Deck model definitely shows its age in 2026. Many of the most graphically demanding games released in the past couple of years just don't run well on this hardware, if they're supported at all. Issues with Linux and anti-cheat software have rendered live-service games like Destiny 2 and Apex Legends unplayable, too.

That said, the Deck can still play tons of games that just aren't possible on the original Nintendo Switch or other handhelds at this price, from Elden Ring to Final Fantasy VII Rebirth to Kingdom Come: Deliverance II. It's also a natural home for the mountain of older and/or smaller-scale gems littered throughout Steam. (Hello, Balatro.) While official game support is limited to a subset of the Steam library, the list of formally verified and still-playable titles is massive, diverse and constantly growing. You can easily stream games, too, and there are workarounds to access other storefronts.

As for software, a steady stream of updates has turned Valve's SteamOS into a flexible yet user-friendly platform. You'll still need to make tweaks every now and then to get a game running optimally, but the process is typically straightforward, and there's a wealth of community-driven resources that document exactly what settings you may need to change.

The Deck's processing power, combined with third-party tools like EmuDeck, makes it a superb handheld for emulation as well. Some PS3 and original Xbox games can be tricky, but just about everything else works beautifully. You can also cloud stream Xbox games with a little setup.

The Steam Deck's biggest issue is its size: At two inches thick and nearly a foot long, it stretches the definition of a "handheld" device, even if the OLED model is lighter by comparison. The LCD Deck can get warm and noisy fairly quickly, too, and the d-pad on both devices is somewhat mushy. But the contoured grips on the back help offset the bulk, and both versions feel sturdy, with responsive face buttons and triggers, smooth joysticks and useful dual touchpads.

• Pros: Enough power to play many modern PC games; User-friendly interface; Vivid display on OLED model; LCD model is fantastic value; Superb emulation performance.
• Cons: Bulky; Not the most powerful hardware; Doesn't officially support every Steam game or games from other PC clients.

Best premium handheld gaming PC

Lenovo Legion Go S (SteamOS, Z1 Extreme)

Display: 8-inch IPS, 1,290 x 1,200p resolution, 500 nits brightness, 120Hz, VRR | Processor: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme | RAM: 32GB LPDDR5 7500 MT/s | Storage: 1TB SSD | Battery: 55.5Whr | Dimensions: 11.77 x 5.02 x 0.89 inches | Weight: 1.61 pounds | Wireless: Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3 | OS: SteamOS

The Lenovo Legion Go S is the closest thing we have to a Steam Deck 2. It's the first third-party device to natively run SteamOS, and as such it has all the same conveniences (and occasional game compatibility issues) as Valve's handheld. The difference is that it's a more modern piece of hardware, with a beefier AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme processor, 32GB of RAM and a 1TB SSD in the configuration we tested. It can also reach a maximum power draw of 33W in handheld mode or 40W when plugged in, well above the Deck's 15W. All of that makes it better for more resource-intensive games. It can be a noticeable improvement at equal settings, and you get far more room to crank things up and reach that magic 60 frames per second (fps) target in many recent AAA games.

The Legion Go S has a larger 8-inch display than the Deck, with a sharper 1,920 x 1,200 resolution and faster 120Hz refresh rate. It also supports variable refresh rates (VRR), which helps minimize distracting screen tearing. That is a crucial advantage, and the extra real estate is great for taking games in. This is an LCD display, however, not the OLED panel available with the Deck. Colors aren't quite as vivid and peak brightness is lower at 500 nits. There's no HDR either. Still, it's above-average. Which is "better" really comes down to how much you value VRR and pixel count against OLED-level contrast.

The Legion Go S is a little chunkier and heavier than the Steam Deck, which already isn't exactly svelte, so it'll be even more fatiguing to hold for hours at a time. But if you can handle the weight, you may find this design more ergonomic. The rounded edges and textured grips are natural to hold, while many longtime console players will feel more at home with the offset joysticks and d-pad. Hall effect sensors (which reduce the risk of joystick drift) and dual USB-C ports are nice perks as well.

There are only two back buttons and one dinky touchpad, however, if you find yourself using those often. The extra horsepower means the fans are much louder. And while it has a bigger 55.5Whr battery, the Deck often lasts a bit longer, especially with less demanding games. If you want to max things out with the heavier stuff, expect the Legion Go S to survive for less than two hours.

The biggest trade-off is the price: The Z1 Extreme version of the Legion Go S now costs a hefty $900. But if you're looking to play recent blockbusters on the go more than indie games or the older gems in your backlog, it should be worth grabbing.

There is another configuration of the Legion Go S with a lower-tier Ryzen Z2 Go chip, 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage available for $650, which is $100 more than the Steam Deck OLED. We haven't been able to test that one yet, but it should still be more performant than Valve's device, albeit to a lesser extent. If you want a SteamOS device with a bigger screen, higher resolution and VRR, it's worth considering. That said, keep in mind that Valve is opening up SteamOS to more third-party devices as time goes on.

• Pros: Better performance than Steam Deck and most Windows handhelds; Runs official SteamOS; Spacious display with VRR; Good ergonomics.
• Cons: Pricey; Heavier than Steam Deck; No HDR support; Weak haptics.

Best Windows gaming handheld

ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X

Display: 7-inch IPS, 1080p resolution, 500 nits brightness, 120Hz, VRR | Processor: AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme | RAM: 24GB LPDDR5X 8000 MT/s | Storage: 1TB SSD | Battery: 80Whr | Dimensions: 11.45 x 4.78 x 2 inches | Weight: 1.58 pounds | Wireless: Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.4 | OS: Windows 11

If you're willing to spend extra for more software flexibility, you can skip the SteamOS devices and buy a Windows-based handheld instead. The ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X is our current favorite of those, and it's a decent if expensive alternative to the Steam Deck if you're willing to trade some ease of use for a higher performance ceiling.

While Microsoft is marketing it as a handheld Xbox, the Xbox Ally X is really just another iteration of ASUS' ROG Ally line of portable gaming PCs. It can't play every game you might own on an Xbox console, nor does it use the exact same simple UI. So don't go in expecting this to be the Xbox version of a Nintendo Switch. Instead, it runs Windows 11, just like the original ROG Ally and ROG Ally X before it. However, this model ships with a new "Xbox full screen experience" that essentially uses a modified version of the Xbox PC app as its default interface. This aggregates and organizes your PC games from across storefronts (Steam included), reduces background tasks to marginally aid performance and generally makes it easier to navigate the device with gamepad controls.

Taking a wider view, there are three main reasons to consider the ROG Xbox Ally X over the Steam Deck. As with the Legion Go S, the first is power: The last couple of ROG Ally devices were already more consistent about playing graphically intense games at higher frame rates, thanks in large part to a "Turbo mode" that boosts the device's power draw to 25W, or 30W when plugged in. Here, the latter bumps up to 35W. Either way, the Ryzen Z2 Extreme chip and 24GB of RAM in the Xbox Ally X only furthers this advantage, especially at lower power draws. If you mainly want to play demanding AAA games, this device is far more likely than the Deck to run them well, both today and into the future. It's still a handheld, so you'll have to tinker to get some games running optimally, but you won't have to resort to "potato" settings nearly as often as you do with Valve's machines.

The second major selling point is VRR. The 7-inch LCD display here is virtually identical to the one used on older ROG Allys: It's neither as bright nor color-rich as the Steam Deck OLED's screen, nor is it as spacious as the Legion Go S' panel. But it's both sharper (1080p) and faster (120Hz) than the Deck's display, and its VRR support does wonders to keep games looking smooth even when their frame rate fluctuates.

The third key advantage, and the Xbox Ally X's biggest pro compared to the Legion Go S, is the fact that Windows lets you play games from any PC client instead of funneling you toward a selection of Steam games. If you've built up libraries on stores like Epic, GOG or the Xbox app, you can access them here like you would on any other Windows PC — no workarounds required. For Xbox Game Pass games, Epic Games Store exclusives or finicky always-online titles like Destiny 2 that require anti-cheat software, this is great.

The new Xbox full screen experience does go some way toward minimizing the clunkiness that has long plagued Windows gaming handhelds. Putting the device into sleep mode (mostly) works now. The new app switcher is intuitive. And you do have the freedom to install a distro like Bazzite if you want a near-identical (if unofficial) experience to SteamOS. Of course, you could also just spend most of your time using Steam's Big Picture Mode.

That said, you'll probably still run into some familiar Windows quirks and annoyances here. Navigating the OS with touch controls is still frustrating whenever you inevitably end up having to go outside of the Xbox UI. Needing to use the desktop version of the Windows update tool to update the Xbox app, for example, is just awkward. Sometimes you may need to jump into ASUS' Armoury Crate app to access certain settings instead of the main Xbox UI. Sometimes you won't see a pop-up, error message or launched app without manually checking what's going on in the background yourself. And no gaming handheld ever needs programs like Microsoft Teams or OneDrive to come pre-installed.

To reiterate: This isn't an Xbox, it's a Windows PC. And while it's certainly better than other Windows handhelds at feeling less... Windows-y, the Steam Deck and SteamOS remain easier to just pick up and use, even if they feel more closed off as a result. But if the flexibility of Windows appeals to you, the changes here do make things a bit more legible. Just note that other handhelds are set to receive this new Xbox UI as well starting next year.

It also helps that the Xbox Ally X is a nice piece of kit. It's still chunky and heavy, but its pronged grips make it easier to hold for longer stretches than previous Ally devices. The giant 80Whr battery helps it last longer than most Windows handhelds we've tested — we got roughly three and a half hours out of Clair Obscur: Expedition 33, for example, playing in 1080p at medium settings with the screen brightness maxed out. The face buttons, joysticks and triggers are all tight and comfortable; together they make it feel like you're using a traditional Xbox controller. The speakers are nice and loud, too.

The Xbox Ally X costs $1,000, so there's no getting around the fact that it's a luxury purchase. You could get a Steam Deck OLED and a Nintendo Switch 2 for the same price. But if you have an Xbox Game Pass subscription, or if you're willing to brave the occasional UX sloppiness in order to play games from any client anywhere you want, it could be worthwhile. If nothing else, it should hold up better than most portable PCs going forward.

Be aware that ASUS makes a lower-cost version of this device called the ROG Xbox Ally (no X). We haven't been able to test that one, but it comes with a weaker Ryzen Z2 A chip, a smaller battery and half the memory and storage, so it's a questionable value at $600.

• Pros: More powerful than Steam Deck; Works with any Windows gaming client; 1080p 120Hz display with VRR; Comfortable grips; Supports new full-screen Xbox experience.
• Cons: Expensive; A bit bulky; Windows 11 still has quirks on handhelds; Lackluster haptics; No included case.

Best mobile gaming handheld for most people

Retroid Pocket 5

Display: 5.5-inch OLED, 1080p resolution, 500 nits brightness, 60Hz | Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | RAM: 8GB LPDDR4x | Storage: 128GB UFS 3.1 | Battery: 5,000mAh | Dimensions: 7.84 x 3.09 x 0.61 inches | Weight: 0.62 pounds | Wireless: Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.1 | OS: Android 13

The Retroid Pocket 5 is the handheld to get if you mainly want to emulate older consoles. It's an Android-based device that's far less powerful than portable PCs like Steam Deck or ROG Ally X, so it can only play PC, PS5 and Xbox games via streaming. But if you want something more compact and are willing to go through the many, many rigors of getting emulators to actually work, it's an excellent device.

The Pocket 5 runs on a Snapdragon 865 chip (the same one used by flagship phones from 2020) and 8GB of RAM, plus it has a built-in fan you can set to three different modes to gain a little extra performance. This gives it enough power to play most games from the PlayStation 2 and Nintendo GameCube, two popular retro consoles that can be tough for mobile handhelds to emulate. With some setup, we were able to play relatively demanding PS2 fare like Gran Turismo 4, ESPN NFL 2K5, Ratchet & Clank: Up Your Arsenal and Midnight Club 3 at full speed and 1.5x to 2.5x their native resolution. GameCube games like Super Mario Sunshine, The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker, and F-Zero GX, meanwhile, were rock solid at a 2x or 3x upscale. All of that is fantastic for the money.

Just about everything we tested from consoles below the PS2 and GameCube on the performance totem pole — PSP, Dreamcast, PS1, N64, etc. — ran flawlessly at a 3-5x upscale (which maxes out the display's resolution). Most Wii and 3DS games we tested were smooth at 720p to 1080p as well, though translating the Wii remote to a handheld is often cumbersome, and the 5.5-inch panel is a bit cramped for viewing two DS screens. You can get some Switch games to work, too, but we discourage that when the Switch is still readily available to buy today. As for modern games, Xbox cloud streaming ran about as well as it does on any other device, while native Android apps like Diablo Immortal, Call of Duty Mobile and Asphalt Legends Unite gave us zero issues at max settings.

Let's be clear: If you're new to emulation, you need to go into a device like this expecting to tinker. Even after the laborious process of securing ROM files, downloading the best versions of certain emulators, mapping different control schemes for each console and navigating the menu hell that is RetroArch, some games just won't work right.

The Pocket 5 isn't immune to this. We had to install a third-party GPU driver to avoid visual glitches in games like New Super Mario Bros. Wii and Mario Superstar Baseball. Gran Turismo 4 required us to tweak the display crop to hide overscan-related artifacts. The most popular Sega Saturn emulator for Android is a mess, so we had to point games for that system to a specific RetroArch core (at which point they all ran great). You will have to fiddle with resolution, rendering and active cooling settings to get many games going at their best — and even then, some tricky ones like Star Wars Rogue Squadron II will suffer from debilitating slowdowns. It's all terribly tedious. But you'd do it because you truly love old games and don't mind putting in work to enjoy them comfortably, at a decent price.

We wouldn't call the Pocket 5's plastic frame "premium," but it's clearly sturdier and more substantial than most emulation handhelds from little-known Chinese companies. The 1080p OLED display is the highlight: It makes everything look more vibrant, from the deep blue ocean of The Wind Waker to the green vegetation in Stardew Valley, and it's sufficiently sharp and bright. There are textured, modestly-sized grips around the back that give your fingers a natural place to rest. The face buttons are smooth to press, with a comfortable level of travel. The d-pad is firm and precise enough for us to play Tetris DX without whining. The analog triggers are conveniently wide and flared, while the clicky bumpers are easy to distinguish. The speakers, while not incredibly full-sounding, can get surprisingly loud.

Our main complaint is with the joystick layout, which situates the left stick underneath the d-pad. This is fine on a PS5 controller, but here it can make playing more modern games a literal pain, as it invites you to leave your left hand dangling partway off the device. But the sticks themselves are neither too loose nor too tight, and they should avoid drifting issues over time thanks to their magnetic Hall effect sensors.

Battery life can vary from three-ish hours with demanding Android games to more than 10 hours when emulating older 8- and 16-bit consoles. That's solid. The active cooling system keeps the device from ever feeling too hot, though its highest setting is pretty noisy; you wouldn't want to use it around a sleeping partner. It's also worth noting that the design won't actually fit in most pockets, as its name implies, but it certainly won't hog space in a bag or purse.

• Pros: Capable emulation and Android gaming performance; Lovely OLED display; Sticks and buttons feel great; Sturdy, portable design.
• Cons: Requires a ton of tinkering to get some emulators working optimally; Joystick layout isn't ideal for modern games.

Another good option

Retroid Pocket Flip 2

Display: 5.5-inch OLED, 1080p resolution, 500 nits brightness, 60Hz | Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | RAM: 8GB LPDDR4x | Storage: 128GB UFS 3.1 | Battery: 5,000mAh | Dimensions: 5.53 x 3.52 x 0.96 inches | Weight: 0.79 pounds | Wireless: Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.1 | OS: Android 13

The Retroid Pocket Flip 2 is essentially the Pocket 5 in a clamshell shape. It runs on the same chip — and thus can emulate the same wide range of retro games — with the same great OLED display, Hall effect joysticks, active cooling system, 5,000mAh battery and clean Android OS. The face buttons, triggers, bumpers and d-pad are all roughly as responsive, though the built-in fan can still get distractingly loud at full blast and the speakers don't offer the best separation (but still get plenty loud).

It's just built like a fatter Nintendo DS with no second display. It's thicker and heavier than the Pocket 5, and it has a flat back, so we find it a touch more fatiguing to use over time. There's also a bit too much empty space on the bottom half — the face buttons and d-pad definitely have room to be larger. And since this is a clamshell, the joysticks have to be recessed in little divots to avoid pressing against the display. They're still smooth and accurate, but using them always feels somewhat awkward.

However, separating the display gives more space for the different control elements to breathe. The joysticks are offset from the d-pad and face buttons, which makes them feel less cramped with games that are more reliant on analog input. They also sit above the other inputs, so you don't have to reach as much when playing Game Boy, SNES or other systems that aren't built for joystick control at all.

The clamshell shape gives everything a natural layer of protection, which in turn makes the device easier to just chuck in a bag. Though we can't say how well the hinge will hold up years down the road, it feels appropriately tight, and it's given us no issues after several weeks of testing. The Flip 2 costs $10 more than the Pocket 5 before tariffs, but whether it's worth buying entirely comes down to how you feel about clamshells. If you want a retro handheld that's more DS than PSP, grab it instead.

• Pros: Capable emulation and Android gaming performance; Sturdy clamshell design provides a natural layer of protection; Lovely OLED display.
• Cons: Requires a ton of tinkering to get some emulators working optimally; Recessed joysticks; Buttons and d-pad could be larger.

Best mobile gaming handheld overall

AYN Odin 2

Display: 6-inch IPS, 1080p resolution, 60Hz | Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | RAM: 8GB, 12GB or 16GB LPDDR5x | Storage: 128GB, 256GB or 512GB UFS 4.0 | Battery: 8,000mAh | Dimensions: 8.86 x 3.86 x 0.67 inches | Weight: 0.93 pounds | Wireless: Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.3 | OS: Android 13

If you have more cash to burn on an emulation-focused machine, the AYN Odin 2 is a step up from the Retroid Pocket 5 and Flip 2. This Android device can play everything those picks can, just smoother and more reliably. That's mainly due to its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor, which is the same chip used by flagship phones from 2023.

The Odin 2 starts at $299 for 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage, which is expensive when the entry-level Steam Deck can run PC games natively for just $100 more. (And in the US, tariffs may erase that gap entirely.) Still, among more compact mobile handhelds, there aren't many alternatives that run this well at this price. It played all PS2 and GameCube games we tested at two to three times their native resolution, while systems like the PS1, N64 and Dreamcast had no problems at a 3-5x upscale. Most 3DS and Wii games had little to no slowdowns at 2-3x, either. It's better than most with the Sega Saturn, and it can play a wider range of Switch games than the Pocket 5 and Flip 2 (though you should just buy a Switch if that's a major concern). More challenging systems will still require some settings tweaks, but the superior chip means you won't need to tinker on a game-by-game basis as extensively as you would with a lower-cost device.

It's not just raw performance, though: The Odin 2 is also a refined piece of hardware. It's larger than Retroid's handhelds, but it's still much less chunky than a portable PC, and the curved grips on its back are inviting to hold. The d-pad, face buttons, analog triggers and Hall effect joysticks all feel great; the latter are also offset, which makes the design comfier than the Pocket 5 for streaming recent console and PC games. Other touches like a fingerprint scanner, a dedicated return button, a micro-HDMI out port, two customizable back buttons and clear front-facing speakers are all nice perks.

The 6-inch 1080p touchscreen isn't as color-rich as the Retroid's OLED panel, but it's still bright and well-sized for modern games. Battery life is superb: We got more than eight hours of juice emulating systems like the PS2, but that jumped over 20 hours with lighter tasks. The device supports 65W fast charging as well. Cloud streaming and native Android games work as they should, and since the whole thing runs on a lightly modded version of Android, its stock interface should feel familiar to most.

AYN sells a few different variants of the Odin 2, including the PS Vita-esque Odin 2 Mini and the larger, OLED-sporting Odin 2 Portal. These run on the same chipset as the standard model, so they should be just as powerful. Both should be a little more niche, however. The Retroid Pocket 5 gets you most of the way to the Mini for $120 less. The Odin 2 Portal is definitely more appealing, but it's closer to the Steam Deck's width (and price) yet much less capable than Valve's machine on the whole.

As noted above, you may want to wait on all of these if you need the absolute latest: AYN has launched a new Odin 3 device since our most recent update. We aim to test that one in the near future.

• Pros: Excellent emulation and Android gaming performance; Comfortable; Great battery life.
• Cons: Relatively pricey for a mobile handheld (even before tariffs); Setting up emulators can still be laborious; Docked experience isn't seamless.

Best Game Boy-style handheld for classic portable games

Analogue Pocket

Display: 3.5-inch LCD, 1,600 x 1,440 resolution, VRR 30Hz-62Hz | Chipset: Altera Cyclone V FPGA, Altera Cyclone 10 FPGA | RAM: 3.4MB BRAM, 2x 16MB 16-bit cellular RAM, 64MB 16-bit SDRAM, 256KB 16-bit asynchronous SRAM | Battery: 4,300mAh | Dimensions: 5.86 x 3.46 x 0.86 inches | Weight: 0.61 pounds | OS: Analogue OS

The Analogue Pocket is the ultimate Game Boy. Its vertical design is built like a modernized, premium version of Nintendo's classic handheld, and it can even work with accessories like the Game Boy Camera. Compared to the original, though, the Pocket adds two extra face buttons, a pair of rear triggers, a microSD slot, a USB-C port and a rechargeable battery rated for six to 10 hours of playtime. Most significantly, it has a gorgeous 3.5-inch display that's both backlit and incredibly sharp (615 ppi) but can be set to look like an old Game Boy panel with different filter modes. The device can also output to a TV with an optional dock.

Unlike the retro handhelds mentioned above, the Pocket is designed to play actual cartridges, not just ROM files. It works with Game Boy, Game Boy Color and Game Boy Advance games through its cartridge slot, while games from the Sega Game Gear, TurboGrafx-16, Neo Geo Pocket and Atari Lynx are playable through optional adapters.

Like past Analogue devices, the Pocket uses field-programmable gate array (FPGA) motherboards to mimic its target systems on a hardware level. In practice, this means the Pocket's "emulation" of older titles is near-perfect, with a level of responsiveness and visual faithfulness that software-based emulation can't match. Pop in a Game Boy or GBA cartridge and you can essentially play it as intended. That said, thanks to a big post-launch update and an active user community, the Pocket can also run ROMs off a microSD card and thus play systems like the SNES and Sega Genesis.

The Pocket isn't cheap at $220, and its shoulder buttons aren't as crisp to press as the excellent d-pad or face buttons. Still, if you have a collection of Game Boy, Game Gear or GBA games, the Pocket is the most elegant way to play them, and it's only become more versatile over time. Its biggest flaw is that it can be prone to stock shortages and shipping delays.

• Pros: Plays Game Boy, Game Boy Color, and GBA cartridges with near-perfect emulation; Gorgeous display; Impressive build quality; Expandable via adapters; Supports software emulation.
• Cons: Stock issues and shipping delays are common; Shoulder buttons feel a little spongy; Tiny volume buttons.

Honorable mention

Playdate

Display: 2.7-inch Memory LCD, 400 x 240 resolution, 1-bit | Chipset: ARM Cortex-M7F @ 168MHz | RAM: 16MB, 8KB L1 cache | Storage: 4GB eMMC | Battery: 740mAh | Dimensions: 2.99 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | Weight: 0.19 pounds | OS: Playdate OS

The Playdate, from app developer and Untitled Goose Game publisher Panic, is a tiny yellow box with a 2.7-inch monochrome display, two face buttons, a d-pad and a physical crank built into its side. We called it a "cross between a Game Boy and a business card" in our review, and it is indeed incredibly small at roughly three inches tall and 0.18 pounds. It has a dedicated game library that largely consists of oddball indies, most of which focus on one or two core ideas instead of trying to stuff in as many mechanics as possible. A couple dozen of those games are bundled with the device, while others are available via a built-in store or sideloading from shops like Itch.io. The hardware is generally well-built, and its battery life is decent at six to eight hours per charge.

At $229 after a price hike, it's hard to call the Playdate a great value when it's only designed to play a selection of niche games. Its display isn't backlit, either. But in a sea of devices that try to be everything for everyone, the Playdate is admirably focused and low-key. If you're into smaller-scale fare and have some money to play with, it'll be a fun toy.

What about the Nintendo Switch 2?

The new Nintendo Switch 2 is already more popular than any of the handhelds above, but we haven't made it a formal pick in this guide since it exists in its own world. As one of the newest devices from the big three console manufacturers, most people aren't choosing between it and the handheld PCs or emulation devices above. The main reason to buy a Switch 2 is to play new Nintendo games, and no other device can (legally) offer that. Likewise, the Switch 2 doesn't even try to offer the flexibility of a Steam Deck, ROG Ally X or even the Retroid Pocket 5.

That said, the hardware itself is a significant upgrade over its predecessor, with dramatically improved performance, a sharper, faster and bigger 7.9-inch display, magnetic Joy-Con controllers and more storage. It's a wholly more polished take on the Switch 1's ideas.

Does that make it a must-buy right now? Unless you're worried about a tariff-induced price hike — which may not be the most outlandish fear — not really. Donkey Kong Bananza is a joy, Mario Kart World is fun enough and playing Cyberpunk 2077 on a Nintendo console is kind of surreal, but the list of true must-plays that are exclusive to the Switch 2 is still limited. That's OK — it's only been a few months. But don't feel like you must rush out and splash the cash today unless you have a serious case of Donkey Kong-induced FOMO.

Other gaming handhelds we've tested

Lenovo Legion Go 2

The Lenovo Legion Go 2 is a capable alternative to the ROG Xbox Ally X with a mondo-sized 8.8-inch display. That screen is the main reason to consider it, as it's a vivid OLED panel that supports VRR

Source: Engadget News

E Ink tablets have evolved significantly, offering the tactile satisfaction of paper notebooks with digital conveniences. Below are the top models for 2026, with key facts on their features, pros, and cons.

reMarkable 2: Best for most people

Key Facts:

• Screen: 10.3-inch monochrome E Ink
• Battery: Up to two weeks
• Connectivity: Wi-Fi
• Storage: 8GB
• Stylus: Sold separately (standard Marker or Marker Plus)
• File Support: PDF, EPUB
• Price: $399 (with standard Marker); $449 (with Marker Plus)

The reMarkable 2 provides the best balance of writing feel, build quality, and ease of use. Its low-latency pen input feels close to real paper, and the device integrates with cloud services like Google Drive and Dropbox. However, the stylus costs extra, and full cloud features require a $3/month subscription.

Pros: Excellent writing experience; great reading experience; easy file management. Cons: Marker costs extra; expensive; cloud storage subscription needed for unlimited sync.

reMarkable Paper Pro: Best premium option

Key Facts:

• Screen: 11.8-inch Canvas Color E Ink (20,000 colors)
• Battery: Up to two weeks
• Connectivity: Wi-Fi
• Storage: 64GB
• Stylus: Sold separately
• File Support: PDF, EPUB
• Price: $629 (with standard Marker); $579 (on sale)

The Paper Pro boasts a larger color display, faster processor (1.8GHz quad-core), and improved latency (12ms). It feels premium and zippy, but remains expensive. The color screen adds utility for highlighting and diagrams. Like the reMarkable 2, it uses a streamlined interface and the Connect subscription.

Pros: Color display; backlight for dark environments; improved performance. Cons: High price; subscription needed for full cloud access.

Amazon Kindle Scribe: Best e-reader E Ink tablet

Key Facts:

• Screen: 11-inch monochrome E Ink (300 ppi)
• Battery: Up to months
• Connectivity: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth
• Storage: Up to 64GB
• Stylus: Included with premium pen
• File Support: Kindle formats (AZW3, AZW, TXT, PDF, unprotected MOBI, PRC)
• Price: $430 (no front light); $500 (with front light); $630 (Colorsoft with color display)

The latest Kindle Scribe offers faster performance, improved stylus, and seamless integration with the Kindle ecosystem. It supports limited markup of Kindle books (underlines and highlights) and notebook creation. The AI Search feature is hit-or-miss but useful for synthesizing notes. The Kindle library is a major draw for existing Amazon users.

Pros: Fast performance; low-latency writing; included premium pen; huge ebook library. Cons: AI Search needs improvement; markup of Kindle books is inconsistent.

Supernote A6 X2 (Nomad): Best for writing and note-taking

Key Facts:

• Screen: 7.8-inch monochrome E Ink
• Battery: Weeks
• Connectivity: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth
• Storage: 32GB (expandable via microSD up to 2TB)
• Stylus: Sold separately
• File Support: PDF, EPUB, Word, TXT, PNG, JPG, CBZ, FB2, XPS
• Price: $329 (A6 X2); $505 (Manta A5 X2 with 10.7-inch screen); stylus from $89

The Supernote excels in note-taking with features like keyword search, handwriting conversion, and custom templates. The FeelWrite 2 screen protector provides a smooth writing feel. Both the Nomad and Manta are user-repairable with replaceable batteries. The device runs a customized Linux-based OS with an app store (Kindle app included). It lacks a backlight.

Pros: Excellent writing experience; extensive notebook customization; good handwriting recognition; expandable storage. Cons: Stylus costs extra; no backlight; learning curve.

Onyx Boox Note Air4 C: Another color-display option

Key Facts:

• Screen: 10.3-inch Kaleido 3 color E Ink
• Battery: Weeks
• Connectivity: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth
• Storage: 64GB
• Stylus: Included
• File Support: Wide range including PDF, EPUB, DOC, MOBI, and more
• Price: $529 (bundle with stylus and case)

The Note Air4 C runs Android 13 with access to the Google Play Store, making it the most versatile for third-party apps. It offers low-latency writing with color brushes, AI handwriting recognition, and note sharing via email or cloud. The display is good for reading and note-taking, but not ideal for video consumption.

Pros: Color E Ink; full Android ecosystem; stylus included; versatile file support. Cons: Not good for video; less user-friendly than competitors; expensive.

Onyx Boox Note Max: Big-screen option

Key Facts:

• Screen: 13.3-inch Carta 1300 monochrome E Ink (300 ppi)
• Battery: Weeks
• Connectivity: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth
• Storage: 128GB
• Stylus: Included
• File Support: Same as Note Air4 C
• Price: $689 (includes cover and stylus)

The Note Max is ideal for users who prefer A4-sized notebooks. Its large display is perfect for doodling, calendar memos, and multitasking. It runs Android 13 and supports the Google Play Store. However, it lacks a front light and is quite expensive.

Pros: Sharp large display; expansive screen real estate; Android app support; included accessories. Cons: No front light; complex interface; high price.

Honorable Mention: reMarkable Paper Pro Move

Key Facts:

• Screen: 7.3-inch Canvas Color E Ink
• Battery: Two weeks
• Storage: 64GB
• Stylus: Included
• Price: $449

A compact version of the Paper Pro, the Move offers the same color screen and software in a steno-pad-sized body. It lacks a keyboard folio but is highly portable.

Pros: Compact; excellent build; good battery. Cons: Expensive for size; no keyboard option.

Honorable Mention: Kobo Libra Colour

Key Facts:

• Screen: 7-inch Kaleido 3 color E Ink
• Battery: Up to 40 days
• Storage: 32GB
• Stylus: Sold separately ($70)
• Price: $229 (without stylus); $300 with stylus

The Libra Colour combines Kobo's ereader ecosystem with stylus support for margin notes and notebooks. Its color display adds engagement, and the device is snappy with a warm front light. It's a solid alternative to the Kindle Scribe for those who prefer Kobo's library.

Pros: Color display; good performance; margin writing in ebooks; Dropbox/Google Drive sync. Cons: Smaller screen; stylus costs extra.

Are E Ink tablets worth it?

E Ink tablets are ideal for those who prefer a paper-like reading and writing experience, want to reduce distractions, or need a dedicated device for note-taking. They are less suited for multimedia consumption or heavy app usage. The choice depends on your budget, screen size preferences, and ecosystem (Kindle vs. Kobo vs. open Android).

What to look for in an E Ink tablet

Writing and latency

Look for low-latency stylus input and a screen that refreshes smoothly. Many tablets offer pressure sensitivity and tilt support. Some include a stylus; others require a separate purchase.

Reading

Consider screen size, supported file formats, and integration with ebook stores. Larger screens (10+ inches) are better for writing but less portable. Kindle and Kobo devices seamlessly sync with their respective libraries.

Search functionality

Handwriting recognition and keyword search vary. Some devices allow searching through handwritten notes, while others focus on typed text. Evaluate how important organization and retrieval are for your use case.

Sharing and connectivity

Wi-Fi and cloud syncing are common. Check if the device supports mobile apps or direct export to services like Google Drive, Dropbox, or email. None offer native OneNote or Evernote integration.

Price

E Ink tablets typically range from $300 to $800. Larger screens and color displays increase cost. Accessories like styluses and cases can add $50–$200.

Source: Engadget News